University of Glamorgan, Care Sciences, Trefforest, Pontypridd, UK.
Palliat Med. 2013 Feb;27(2):165-71. doi: 10.1177/0269216311432898. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
Patients with advanced life-limiting diseases have high information needs concerning prognosis yet discussions between patients and healthcare professionals are either avoided or inaccurate due to over-optimism. Available prognostic models are problematic. Literature indicates that hospital specialist palliative care professionals are frequently asked to prognosticate, although their experience of prognostication is unknown. Identifying this experience will support the development of prognosis training for hospital specialist palliative care professionals.
To explore hospital specialist palliative care professionals' experience of prognostication.
'How do specialist palliative care team members prognosticate?'; 'How do they view prognostication?'
Qualitative research - focus group interviews.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Three UK hospital specialist palliative care teams. Participants included medical doctors and palliative care nurses. Inclusion/exclusion criteria: member of hospital specialist palliative care team with knowledge and experience of prognostication. Numbers of participants: four hospital specialist palliative medicine consultants, three senior doctors in training, nine clinical nurse specialists.
Two major themes: Difficulties of prognostication; Benefits of prognostication. Eleven sub-themes: Difficulties (Non-malignant disease; Communicating uncertainty; Seeking definitive prognosis; Participants' feelings; Confidence in prognostication; Estimating prognosis; Dealing with reaction of prognosis; Prognostic error); Benefits (Patient informed decision-making prioritizing needs and care; Family-prioritizing commitments; Services accessing funding and services planning patient care).
Findings highlight lack of evidence to support practice, and identify the complexity and emotional labour involved in prognostication by hospital specialist palliative care team members, and are used to discuss recommendations for further research and practice.
患有晚期绝症的患者对预后有很高的信息需求,但由于过于乐观,患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的讨论要么被回避,要么不准确。现有的预后模型存在问题。文献表明,医院专科姑息治疗专业人员经常被要求进行预后判断,尽管他们的预后判断经验尚不清楚。确定这一经验将有助于为医院专科姑息治疗专业人员开展预后判断培训。
探讨医院专科姑息治疗专业人员的预后判断经验。
“专科姑息治疗小组成员如何进行预后判断?”;“他们如何看待预后判断?”
定性研究-焦点小组访谈。
地点/参与者:三个英国医院专科姑息治疗团队。参与者包括医生和姑息治疗护士。纳入/排除标准:具有预后判断知识和经验的医院专科姑息治疗小组成员。参与者人数:四位医院专科姑息医学顾问、三位住院医师、九位临床护理专家。
两个主要主题:预后判断的困难;预后判断的益处。十一个子主题:困难(非恶性疾病;沟通不确定性;寻求明确的预后;参与者的感受;预后判断的信心;估计预后;应对预后的反应;预后错误);益处(患者知情决策,优先考虑需求和护理;家庭优先考虑承诺;服务获取资金和服务规划患者护理)。
研究结果强调缺乏实践证据的支持,并确定了医院专科姑息治疗小组成员在预后判断中所涉及的复杂性和情感劳动,这些发现被用于讨论进一步研究和实践的建议。