Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e26110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026110. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is considered to be an alternative to surgery. Extracorporeal ultrasound-guided HIFU (USgFU) has been clinically used to treat solid tumors. Preliminary trials in a small sample of a Western population suggested that this modality was safe. Most trials are performed in China thereby providing comprehensive data for understanding the safety profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate adverse events of USgFU therapy.
Clinical data were searched in 2 Chinese databases. Adverse events of USgFU were summarized and compared with those of magnetic resonance-guided HIFU (MRgFU; for uterine, bone or breast tumor) and transrectal ultrasound-guided HIFU (for prostate cancer or benign prostate hyperplasia). USgFU treatment was performed using 7 types of device. Side effects were evaluated in 13262 cases. There were fewer adverse events in benign lesions than in malignant lesions (11.81% vs. 21.65%, p<0.0001). Rates of adverse events greatly varied between the disease types (0-280%, p<0.0001) and between the applied HIFU devices in both malignant (10.58-44.38%, p<0.0001) and benign lesions (1.67-17.57%, p<0.0001). Chronological analysis did not demonstrate a decrease in the rate of adverse events. Based upon evaluable adverse events, incidences in USgFU were consistent with those in MRgFU or transrectal HIFU. Some side effects frequently occurred following transrectal HIFU were not reported in USgFU. Several events including intrahepatic metastasis, intraoperative high fever, and occlusions of the superior mesenteric artery should be of particular concern because they have not been previously noted. The types of adverse events suggested that they were ultrasonic lesions.
The frequency of adverse events depended on the location of the lesion and the type of HIFU device; however, side effects of USgFU were not yet understood. USgFU did not decrease the incidence of adverse events compared with MRgFU.
高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)被认为是手术的一种替代方法。体外超声引导 HIFU(USgFU)已在临床上用于治疗实体瘤。在西方小样本初步试验中,该方法被认为是安全的。大多数试验在中国进行,从而为了解安全性概况提供了全面的数据。本研究旨在评估 USgFU 治疗的不良事件。
在中国的 2 个数据库中搜索了临床数据。总结了 USgFU 的不良事件,并与磁共振引导 HIFU(MRgFU;用于子宫、骨或乳腺肿瘤)和经直肠超声引导 HIFU(用于前列腺癌或良性前列腺增生)进行了比较。使用 7 种设备进行 USgFU 治疗。评估了 13262 例患者的副作用。良性病变的不良事件少于恶性病变(11.81%比 21.65%,p<0.0001)。不同疾病类型之间的不良事件发生率差异很大(0-280%,p<0.0001),以及不同恶性病变(10.58-44.38%,p<0.0001)和良性病变(1.67-17.57%,p<0.0001)中使用的 HIFU 设备之间的差异很大。时间序列分析并未显示不良事件发生率降低。根据可评估的不良事件,USgFU 的发生率与 MRgFU 或经直肠 HIFU 一致。一些经直肠 HIFU 常发生的副作用并未在 USgFU 中报道。一些事件包括肝内转移、术中高热和肠系膜上动脉闭塞,应特别关注,因为以前没有报道过这些事件。不良事件的类型表明它们是超声损伤。
不良事件的频率取决于病变的位置和 HIFU 设备的类型;然而,USgFU 的副作用尚未得到充分了解。与 MRgFU 相比,USgFU 并未降低不良事件的发生率。