Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Jan;25(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000410686.14363.ea.
The study evaluated eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from pressure ulcers comparing swabs containing polyhexanide with a cellulose dressing + polyhexanide. After receiving approval from the ethics committee and informed consent, patients from the centers were recruited.
Prospective randomized study. Thirty patients (n = 15/n = 15), not responding to wound disinfection after a washout period of 2 weeks, were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.
This study was performed on hospital patients.
Patients had pressure ulcers containing MRSA.
For the control group, cleansing was performed with polyhexanide swabs (20 minutes), after which a foam dressing was applied. The study group received a polyhexanide-containing cellulose dressing. For bacterial analysis, semiquantitative swab cultures (Robert Koch Institute recommendations) were taken on days 0, 7, and 14 and during 3 consecutive days.
The groups were comparable at baseline. At day 7, in the control group, 6 of 15 (40%) MRSA eradication. For the study group, there were 13 of 15 (86.67%) who showed MRSA eradication. At day 14, in the control group, there were 10 of 15 (66.67%) who had MRSA eradication, compared with the study group, where 15 of 15 (100%; P < .05) had the MRSA eradicated.
Wound disinfection with polyhexanide was shown to be successful in both groups, showing superior results for the study group.
本研究通过比较含聚六亚甲基胍的拭子与纤维素敷料+聚六亚甲基胍,评估了清除压疮中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的效果。在获得伦理委员会批准和知情同意后,从各中心招募了患者。
前瞻性随机研究。30 名患者(n = 15/n = 15)在经过 2 周洗脱期后,对伤口消毒无反应,纳入意向治疗分析。
本研究在医院患者中进行。
患者患有含 MRSA 的压疮。
对照组采用聚六亚甲基胍拭子(20 分钟)进行清洁,然后应用泡沫敷料。研究组接受含聚六亚甲基胍的纤维素敷料。为了进行细菌分析,在第 0、7 和 14 天以及连续 3 天,使用半定量拭子培养(罗伯特·科赫研究所建议)进行取样。
两组基线时具有可比性。在第 7 天,对照组 15 例中有 6 例(40%)MRSA 清除。研究组有 15 例中的 13 例(86.67%)MRSA 清除。在第 14 天,对照组有 15 例中的 10 例(66.67%)MRSA 清除,而研究组有 15 例(100%)MRSA 清除(P <.05)。
两组中聚六亚甲基胍的伤口消毒均有效,研究组的结果更优。