Suppr超能文献

前瞻性随机研究比较含聚六亚甲基胍的纤维素敷料与聚六亚甲基胍棉签在压疮中清除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的效果。

Eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pressure ulcers comparing a polyhexanide-containing cellulose dressing with polyhexanide swabs in a prospective randomized study.

机构信息

Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Jan;25(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000410686.14363.ea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study evaluated eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from pressure ulcers comparing swabs containing polyhexanide with a cellulose dressing + polyhexanide. After receiving approval from the ethics committee and informed consent, patients from the centers were recruited.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study. Thirty patients (n = 15/n = 15), not responding to wound disinfection after a washout period of 2 weeks, were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.

SETTING

This study was performed on hospital patients.

PATIENTS

Patients had pressure ulcers containing MRSA.

INTERVENTIONS

For the control group, cleansing was performed with polyhexanide swabs (20 minutes), after which a foam dressing was applied. The study group received a polyhexanide-containing cellulose dressing. For bacterial analysis, semiquantitative swab cultures (Robert Koch Institute recommendations) were taken on days 0, 7, and 14 and during 3 consecutive days.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable at baseline. At day 7, in the control group, 6 of 15 (40%) MRSA eradication. For the study group, there were 13 of 15 (86.67%) who showed MRSA eradication. At day 14, in the control group, there were 10 of 15 (66.67%) who had MRSA eradication, compared with the study group, where 15 of 15 (100%; P < .05) had the MRSA eradicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound disinfection with polyhexanide was shown to be successful in both groups, showing superior results for the study group.

摘要

目的

本研究通过比较含聚六亚甲基胍的拭子与纤维素敷料+聚六亚甲基胍,评估了清除压疮中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的效果。在获得伦理委员会批准和知情同意后,从各中心招募了患者。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。30 名患者(n = 15/n = 15)在经过 2 周洗脱期后,对伤口消毒无反应,纳入意向治疗分析。

设置

本研究在医院患者中进行。

患者

患者患有含 MRSA 的压疮。

干预措施

对照组采用聚六亚甲基胍拭子(20 分钟)进行清洁,然后应用泡沫敷料。研究组接受含聚六亚甲基胍的纤维素敷料。为了进行细菌分析,在第 0、7 和 14 天以及连续 3 天,使用半定量拭子培养(罗伯特·科赫研究所建议)进行取样。

结果

两组基线时具有可比性。在第 7 天,对照组 15 例中有 6 例(40%)MRSA 清除。研究组有 15 例中的 13 例(86.67%)MRSA 清除。在第 14 天,对照组有 15 例中的 10 例(66.67%)MRSA 清除,而研究组有 15 例(100%)MRSA 清除(P <.05)。

结论

两组中聚六亚甲基胍的伤口消毒均有效,研究组的结果更优。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验