Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University Hospital, Missouri 63104, USA.
Respir Care. 2012 Jan;57(1):165-75. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01640.
Pulmonary function testing is often considered the basis for diagnosis in many categories of pulmonary disease. Although most of the testing methodologies are well established and widely employed, there are still many questions regarding how tests should be performed, how to ensure that reliable data are produced, what reference values and rules should be used, and how pulmonary function tests (PFTs) should be interpreted to best support clinical decision making. This conference was organized around a set of questions aimed at many of these issues. Each presenter was asked to address a specific topic regarding what tests should be done, how those test should be performed to answer a particular clinical question, and to relate test results to an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of the patient. These topics included testing of adults and children, with concentration on important disease entities such as COPD, asthma, and unexplained dyspnea. Special emphasis was given to discussing reference values, lower limits of normal, interpretive strategies to optimize disease classification, and those factors directly affecting data quality. Established techniques for spirometry, lung volumes, diffusing capacity, exercise testing, and bronchial challenges were compared and contrasted with new technologies, and with technologies that might be part of pulmonary function laboratories in the near future.
肺功能测试通常被认为是许多肺部疾病类别的诊断基础。尽管大多数测试方法已经得到很好的确立和广泛应用,但仍有许多问题涉及如何进行测试、如何确保生成可靠的数据、应使用哪些参考值和规则,以及如何对肺功能测试 (PFT) 进行解释,以最佳地支持临床决策。本次会议围绕一系列旨在解决这些问题的问题进行组织。每位演讲者都被要求针对特定主题进行演讲,这些主题涉及应进行哪些测试、如何进行这些测试以回答特定的临床问题,以及将测试结果与患者的准确诊断和适当治疗联系起来。这些主题包括成人和儿童的测试,重点关注 COPD、哮喘和不明原因呼吸困难等重要疾病实体。特别强调讨论参考值、正常值下限、解释策略以优化疾病分类以及直接影响数据质量的因素。比较和对比了用于常规肺功能检查的传统技术、肺容量、弥散能力、运动测试和支气管激发试验,以及新技术,以及可能在不久的将来成为肺功能实验室一部分的技术。