Suppr超能文献

客户对墨西哥城公共部门合法堕胎计划护理质量的看法。

Clients' perceptions of the quality of care in Mexico city's public-sector legal abortion program.

机构信息

Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Dec;37(4):191-201. doi: 10.1363/3719111.

Abstract

CONTEXT

In 2007, first-trimester abortion was legalized in Mexico City. Limited research has been conducted to understand clients' perceptions of the abortion services available in public-sector facilities.

METHODS

Perceptions of quality of care were measured among 402 women aged 18 or older who had obtained abortions at any of three public-sector sites in Mexico City in 2009. Six domains of quality of care (client-staff interaction, information provision, technical competence, postabortion contraceptive services, accessibility and the facility environment) were assessed, and ordinal logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the domains that were important in women's overall evaluation of care.

RESULTS

Clients gave overall services a high rating, with a mean of 8.8 out of 10. In multivariate analysis, overall ratings were higher among women who said the doctor made them feel comfortable (odds ratio, 3.3), the receptionist was respectful (1.7), the staff was very careful to protect their privacy (2.5), they had received sufficient information on self-care at home following the abortion and on postabortion emotions (1.9 and 2.0, respectively) and they felt confident in the doctor's technical skill (2.5). Rating site hours as very convenient (2.4), waiting time as acceptable (2.8) and the facility as very clean (1.9) were all associated with higher overall scores. Compared with women who had given birth, those who had not rated the services lower overall (0.6).

CONCLUSION

Efforts to improve patient experiences with abortion services should focus on client-staff interaction, information provision, service accessibility, technical competence and the facility environment. The most highly significant factor appears to be whether a doctor makes a woman feel comfortable during her visit.

摘要

背景

2007 年,墨西哥城将堕胎合法化。目前仅有少量研究旨在了解客户对公共部门堕胎服务的看法。

方法

2009 年,在墨西哥城的三个公共部门地点,对 402 名年龄在 18 岁或以上的接受过堕胎的妇女进行了护理质量感知调查。评估了护理质量的六个领域(医患互动、信息提供、技术能力、堕胎后避孕服务、可及性和设施环境),并进行了有序逻辑回归分析,以确定对妇女护理总体评价重要的领域。

结果

客户对整体服务给予了高度评价,平均得分为 10 分中的 8.8 分。在多变量分析中,以下因素使整体评分更高:医生让她们感到舒适(优势比,3.3)、接待员尊重(1.7)、工作人员非常小心地保护她们的隐私(2.5)、她们在堕胎后和堕胎后情绪方面获得了足够的家庭自我护理和堕胎后情绪信息(分别为 1.9 和 2.0),以及她们对医生的技术技能充满信心(2.5)。将站点的工作时间评为非常方便(2.4)、等待时间可接受(2.8)和设施非常干净(1.9)都与更高的总体评分相关。与已生育的女性相比,未生育的女性对服务的整体评价较低(0.6)。

结论

努力改善堕胎服务的患者体验应侧重于医患互动、信息提供、服务可及性、技术能力和设施环境。最重要的因素似乎是医生在就诊期间是否让女性感到舒适。

相似文献

4
Abortion service provision in South Asia: A comparative study of four countries.南亚的堕胎服务提供情况:四个国家的比较研究。
Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Access to abortion: what women want from abortion services.堕胎服务的可及性:女性对堕胎服务的需求
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Apr;30(4):327-331. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32801-8.
8
Access to safe abortion within the limits of the law.在法律允许的范围内获得安全堕胎服务。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Jun;20(3):421-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.020. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
10
Evaluating abortion-care programs: old challenges, new directions.评估堕胎护理项目:旧挑战,新方向。
Stud Fam Plann. 2005 Sep;36(3):189-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2005.00061.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验