Schmid Stefan, Hilfiker Roger, Radlinger Lorenz
Health, Research and Development Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(9):1137-44. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.01.0003.
This cross-sectional study evaluated the intrasession reliability and concurrent validity of trunk accelerometry (with force plate measurements) for vertical ground reaction force and external mechanical power recorded during a standardized heel-rise (HR) test in 54 elderly subjects (mean +/- standard deviation age 81.2 +/- 6.4 yr).Peak force as well as peak and average power revealed intraclass correlation coefficients of >0.75 and low standard errors of measurement for both the force plate- and the accelerometer-based curves. Correlation coefficients for these variables ranged from 0.95 to 0.98. The accelerometry-derived variables indicated significantly lower absolute values.Trunk accelerometry can be used as a reliable and valid tool for the quantification of the HR test in the elderly population. However, due to several limitations in the protocol, the use of this tool can currently only be recommended in a test-retest manner. Therefore, more research is needed to fully validate this tool for clinical use.
这项横断面研究评估了在54名老年受试者(平均年龄±标准差为81.2±6.4岁)的标准化足跟抬起(HR)测试中,躯干加速度计(结合测力台测量)对于垂直地面反作用力和外部机械功率的组内可靠性及同时效度。测力台和加速度计测量曲线的峰值力以及峰值和平均功率的组内相关系数均>0.75,测量标准误差较低。这些变量的相关系数范围为0.95至0.98。加速度计得出的变量绝对值明显更低。躯干加速度计可作为老年人群HR测试量化的可靠且有效的工具。然而,由于该方案存在若干局限性,目前仅建议以重测方式使用此工具。因此,需要更多研究来充分验证该工具在临床中的应用。