Post-Professional Athletic Training Program, Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):927-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546511431573. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
To improve and standardize the sideline evaluation of sports-related concussion, the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) was developed. This tool assesses concussion-related signs and symptoms, cognition, balance, and coordination. This newly published assessment tool has not established representative baseline data on adolescent athletes.
Representative baseline SCAT2 scores in adolescent athletes will differ by gender, grade in school, and self-reported concussion history.
Descriptive epidemiology study.
Interscholastic athletes were administered the SCAT2 during a preseason concussion baseline testing session. The SCAT2 total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with lower scores indicating poorer performance. Overall, representative values were calculated using descriptive statistics. Separate independent-samples t tests, with gender and concussion history as the independent variables, and a 1-way analysis of variance, with grade as the independent variable, were conducted to assess differences in SCAT2 total score (P < .05).
There were 1134 high school athletes (872 male and 262 female) who participated. The SCAT2 total score across all participants was 88.3 ± 6.8 (range, 58-100); skewness was -0.86 ± 0.07, and kurtosis was 0.73 ± 0.14. Male athletes scored significantly lower on the SCAT2 total score (P = .03; 87.7 ± 6.8 vs 88.7 ± 6.8), and 9th graders (86.9 ± 6.8) scored significantly lower than 11th (88.7 ± 7.0) and 12th (89.0 ± 6.6) graders (P < .001). Athletes with a self-reported concussion history scored significantly lower on the SCAT2 total score than those with no concussion history (P < .001; 87.0 ± 6.8 vs 88.7 ± 6.5).
These data provide representative scores on the SCAT2 in adolescent athletes and show that male athletes, 9th graders, and those with a self-reported concussion history scored significantly lower than their female, upperclassmen, or nonconcussed peers.
These results suggest that healthy adolescent athletes display variability on the SCAT2 at baseline. Therefore, clinicians should administer baseline assessments of the SCAT2 because assuming a perfect baseline score of 100 points is not appropriate in an adolescent athlete population.
为了改进和规范与运动相关的脑震荡的场外评估,开发了运动相关脑震荡评估工具 2(SCAT2)。该工具评估与脑震荡相关的迹象和症状、认知、平衡和协调。这个新发布的评估工具尚未在青少年运动员中建立具有代表性的基线数据。
在青少年运动员中,具有代表性的 SCAT2 基线得分将因性别、在校年级和自我报告的脑震荡史而有所不同。
描述性流行病学研究。
在季前脑震荡基线测试期间,向校际运动员施测 SCAT2。SCAT2 的总分为 0 至 100 分,得分越低表示表现越差。使用描述性统计数据计算总体代表性值。使用独立样本 t 检验(性别和脑震荡史为自变量)和单因素方差分析(年级为自变量),评估 SCAT2 总分的差异(P<.05)。
共有 1134 名高中生(872 名男性和 262 名女性)参加了研究。所有参与者的 SCAT2 总分均为 88.3±6.8(范围为 58-100);偏度为-0.86±0.07,峰度为 0.73±0.14。男性运动员的 SCAT2 总分明显较低(P=.03;87.7±6.8 与 88.7±6.8),9 年级学生(86.9±6.8)的得分明显低于 11 年级(88.7±7.0)和 12 年级(89.0±6.6)学生(P<.001)。有自我报告脑震荡史的运动员的 SCAT2 总分明显低于无脑震荡史的运动员(P<.001;87.0±6.8 与 88.7±6.5)。
这些数据提供了青少年运动员 SCAT2 的代表性得分,并表明男性运动员、9 年级学生和有自我报告脑震荡史的运动员的得分明显低于女性、高年级学生和无脑震荡史的同龄人。
这些结果表明,健康的青少年运动员在基线时的 SCAT2 表现存在差异。因此,临床医生应该进行 SCAT2 的基线评估,因为在青少年运动员人群中,假设 100 分的完美基线分数是不合适的。