Suppr超能文献

标准气液相间相位差及其对气态挥发性有机化合物分析中实验偏差的影响。

Effect of standard phase differences between gas and liquid and the resulting experimental bias in the analysis of gaseous volatile organic compounds.

机构信息

Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Anal Chim Acta. 2012 Feb 10;714:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.11.042. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

Abstract

Liquid- or gas-phase standards can be used for the analysis of VOCs in air. Once the accuracy is secured in the standard preparation stage, the use of gas-phase standard should be more reliable with the least matrix effect. However, it is not difficult to find that the liquid-phase standard is used more preferably in many laboratories for several reasons (e.g., low expense, easy handling, etc.). As such, one needs to accurately evaluate any possible bias stemming from the use of different standard phases. To this end, standards for 8 VOCs consisting of 4 aromatic compounds (benzene (B), toluene (T), styrene (S) and p-xylene (p-X)) and 4 others (methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), butyl acetate (BuAc), and isobutyl alcohol (i-BuAl)) were prepared in both liquid and gas phases. Each standard was analyzed by the initial collection on the adsorption tube and by the combined application of thermal-desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD/GC/MS). The results indicated that experimental bias between the two phases, if expressed in terms of percent difference (PD), was very low in many target VOCs (B (1.09%), T (2.41%), p-X (3.64%), MEK (6.76%), and MIBK (0.17%)), while it was not in some targets (e.g., >10%: e.g., S, i-BuAl, and BuAc). In an ancillary experiment, biases were evaluated further by (1) calibrating gaseous samples against liquid phase standard and via (2) comparison between two different types of gas phase standards. In conclusion, treatment of different standards (e.g., between the same or different phases) will inevitably induce biases in most VOCs, although certain volatiles (e.g., benzene, MIBK, etc.) are virtually unaffected by such variables in a practical sense.

摘要

液体或气相标准可用于分析空气中的挥发性有机化合物。一旦在标准制备阶段确保了准确性,气相标准的使用应该更可靠,且基体效应最小。然而,由于多种原因,许多实验室更倾向于使用液相标准(例如,费用低、易于操作等)。因此,需要准确评估使用不同标准相可能产生的任何偏差。为此,准备了由 4 种芳香族化合物(苯(B)、甲苯(T)、苯乙烯(S)和对二甲苯(p-X))和 4 种其他化合物(甲基乙基酮(MEK)、甲基异丁基酮(MIBK)、乙酸丁酯(BuAc)和异丁醇(i-BuAl)组成的 8 种 VOC 的液相和气相标准。每个标准都通过吸附管的初始收集和热解吸-气相色谱-质谱联用(TD/GC/MS)的组合应用进行分析。结果表明,在许多目标 VOC 中,两种相之间的实验偏差(如果用百分比差异(PD)表示)非常低(B(1.09%)、T(2.41%)、p-X(3.64%)、MEK(6.76%)和 MIBK(0.17%)),而在一些目标物中则不然(例如,>10%:例如,S、i-BuAl 和 BuAc)。在辅助实验中,通过(1)用液相标准校准气态样品和(2)比较两种不同类型的气相标准,进一步评估了偏差。总之,处理不同的标准(例如,相同或不同相之间)不可避免地会使大多数 VOC 产生偏差,尽管某些挥发性化合物(例如,苯、MIBK 等)在实际意义上不受这些变量的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验