Shamseddeen Wael, Clarke Gregory, Keller Martin B, Wagner Karen Dineen, Birmaher Boris, Emslie Graham J, Ryan Neal, Asarnow Joan Rosenbaum, Porta Giovanna, Brent David A
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Sciences, North Chicago, Illinios, USA.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;22(1):29-36. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0027. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
In the Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents, study participants who received medication for sleep had a lower response rate. This report sought to clarify this finding.
Depressed adolescents who had not responded to a previous adequate serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial were randomly assigned to another SSRI, venlafaxine, another SSRI+cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), or venlafaxine+CBT. Augmentation with sleep medication was permitted as clinically indicated.
Youth who received trazodone were six times less likely to respond than those with no sleep medication (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.50, p=0.001) and were three times more likely to experience self-harm (OR=3.0, 95% CI: 1.1-7.9, p=0.03), even after adjusting for baseline differences associated with trazodone use. None (0/13) of those cotreated with trazodone and either paroxetine or fluoxetine responded. In contrast, those treated with other sleep medications had similar rates of response (60.0% vs. 50.4%, χ(2)=0.85, p=0.36) and of self-harm events (OR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.1-2.6, p=0.53) as those who received no sleep medication.
These findings should be interpreted cautiously because these sleep agents were not assigned randomly, but at clinician discretion. Nevertheless, they suggest that the use of trazodone for the management of sleep difficulties in adolescent depression should be re-evaluated and that future research on the management of sleep disturbance in adolescent depression is needed. The very low response rate of participants cotreated with trazodone and either fluoxetine or paroxetine could be due to inhibition of CYP 2D6 by these antidepressants.
在青少年难治性抑郁症治疗研究中,接受助眠药物治疗的参与者缓解率较低。本报告旨在阐明这一发现。
对先前足量使用5-羟色胺选择性再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗无效的抑郁青少年,随机分配至另一种SSRI、文拉法辛、另一种SSRI加认知行为疗法(CBT)或文拉法辛加CBT组。根据临床指征允许加用助眠药物。
服用曲唑酮的青少年缓解可能性比未服用助眠药物的青少年低6倍(校正优势比[OR]=0.16,95%置信区间[CI]:0.05-0.50,p=0.001),且自我伤害可能性高3倍(OR=3.0,95%CI:1.1-7.9,p=0.03),即便校正了与曲唑酮使用相关的基线差异。曲唑酮与帕罗西汀或氟西汀联合治疗的患者无一例(0/13)缓解。相比之下,使用其他助眠药物治疗的患者与未使用助眠药物的患者缓解率(60.0%对50.4%,χ(2)=0.85,p=0.36)及自我伤害事件发生率(OR=0.5,95%CI:0.1-2.6,p=0.53)相似。
这些发现应谨慎解读,因为这些助眠药物并非随机分配,而是由临床医生酌情使用。尽管如此,这些发现提示,青少年抑郁症睡眠困难管理中曲唑酮的使用应重新评估,且未来需要开展青少年抑郁症睡眠障碍管理的研究。曲唑酮与氟西汀或帕罗西汀联合治疗的参与者缓解率极低,可能是由于这些抗抑郁药对CYP 2D6的抑制作用。