Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Health Psychol. 2012 Nov;31(6):763-6. doi: 10.1037/a0026947. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
Physiological effects of social evaluation are central in models of psychosocial influences on physical health. Experimental manipulations of evaluative threat evoke substantial cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses in laboratory studies, but only preliminary evidence is available regarding naturally occurring evaluative threats in daily life. In such nonexperimental ambulatory studies, it is essential to distinguish effects of evaluative threat from related constructs known to alter stress, such as ability perceptions and concerns about appearance.
94 married, working couples (mean age 29.2 years) completed a 1-day (8 a.m. to 10 p.m.) ambulatory blood pressure protocol with random interval-contingent measurements using a Suntech monitor and Palm Pilot-based measures of control variables and momentary experiences of social-evaluative threat, concerns about appearance, and perceived ability.
In hierarchical analyses for couples and multiple measurement occasions (Proc Mixed; SAS) and controlling individual differences (BMI, age, income) and potential confounds (e.g., posture, activity), higher reports of social-evaluative threat were associated with higher concurrent systolic (estimate = .87, SE = .34) and diastolic blood pressure (estimate = 1.06; SE = .26), both p < .02. Effects of social-evaluative threat remained significant when perceived ability and appearance concerns were controlled.
Naturally occurring social-evaluative threat during daily activity is associated with increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Given associations between ambulatory blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular disease, the findings support conceptual models of threats to the social self as a potentially important influence on physical health.
社会评价的生理效应是心理社会因素对身体健康影响模型的核心。在实验室研究中,对评价性威胁的实验性操作会引起大量心血管和神经内分泌反应,但关于日常生活中自然发生的评价性威胁,只有初步证据。在这种非实验性的日常活动研究中,必须将评价性威胁的影响与已知改变压力的相关结构区分开来,例如能力感知和对外观的担忧。
94 对已婚的、有工作的夫妇(平均年龄 29.2 岁)完成了为期一天(上午 8 点至晚上 10 点)的日常血压监测方案,使用 Suntech 监测仪和基于 Palm Pilot 的控制变量和瞬间社会评价威胁、对外表的担忧和感知能力的测量方法进行随机间隔的连续测量。
在夫妻和多次测量场合的分层分析(Proc Mixed;SAS)中,并控制个体差异(BMI、年龄、收入)和潜在的混杂因素(例如,姿势、活动),更高的社会评价威胁报告与更高的同时收缩压(估计值为.87,SE =.34)和舒张压(估计值为 1.06;SE =.26)相关,均为 p <.02。当控制感知能力和对外表的担忧时,社会评价威胁的影响仍然显著。
在日常活动中自然发生的社会评价威胁与收缩压和舒张压升高有关。鉴于日常活动中血压与心血管疾病风险之间的关联,这些发现支持了将社会自我威胁作为对身体健康潜在重要影响的概念模型。