Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Mar-Apr;47(2):178-86. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr168. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
To assess cross-level interactions between neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status (SES) on alcohol consumption and problems, and investigate three possible explanations for such interactions, including the double jeopardy, status inconsistency and relative deprivation hypotheses.
Data from the 2000 and 2005 US National Alcohol Surveys were linked to the 2000 US Census to define respondent census tracts as disadvantaged, middle-class and advantaged. Risk drinking (consumption exceeding national guidelines), monthly drunkenness and alcohol problems were examined among low-, middle- and high-SES past-year drinkers (n = 8728). Gender-stratified, multiple logistic regression models were employed, and for outcomes with a significant omnibus F-test, linear contrasts were used to interpret interactions.
Cross-level SES interactions observed for men indicated that residence in advantaged neighborhoods was associated with markedly elevated odds of risk drinking and drunkenness for low-SES men. Linear contrasts further revealed a nearly 5-fold increased risk for alcohol problems among these men, relative to middle-SES and high-SES men also living in advantaged neighborhoods. Among women, neighborhood disadvantage was related to increased risk for alcohol problems, but there were no significant SES interactions. These findings did not support theories of double jeopardy and status inconsistency.
Consistent with the relative deprivation hypothesis, findings highlight alcohol-related health risks among low-SES men living in affluent neighborhoods. Future research should assess whether this pattern extends to other health risk behaviors, investigate causal mechanisms and consider how gender may influence these.
评估邻里和个体社会经济地位(SES)之间在饮酒和问题上的跨层次相互作用,并探讨这种相互作用的三种可能解释,包括双重风险、地位不一致和相对剥夺假设。
将 2000 年和 2005 年美国国家酒精调查的数据与 2000 年美国人口普查数据相联系,以确定受访者的普查区为贫困、中产阶级和优势。在过去一年中有饮酒行为的低、中、高 SES 饮酒者(n=8728)中,检查风险饮酒(饮酒量超过国家指南)、每月醉酒和酒精问题。采用性别分层、多逻辑回归模型,并对具有显著全模型 F 检验的结果,采用线性对比来解释相互作用。
对男性观察到的跨层次 SES 相互作用表明,居住在优势社区与低 SES 男性的风险饮酒和醉酒显著升高有关。线性对比进一步显示,与同样居住在优势社区的中 SES 和高 SES 男性相比,这些男性的酒精问题风险增加了近 5 倍。对于女性,邻里劣势与酒精问题的风险增加有关,但 SES 之间没有显著的相互作用。这些发现不支持双重风险和地位不一致的理论。
与相对剥夺假设一致,研究结果强调了居住在富裕社区的低 SES 男性的酒精相关健康风险。未来的研究应评估这种模式是否扩展到其他健康风险行为,研究因果机制,并考虑性别如何影响这些行为。