Department of Public Administration, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-791, South Korea.
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Jan 26;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-3.
This study aims to resolve two limitations of previous studies. First, as only a few studies examining social capital have been conducted in non-western countries, it is inconclusive that the concept, which has been developed in Western societies, applies similarly to an Asian context. Second, this study considers social capital at the individual-level, area-level and cross-levels of interaction and examines its associations with health while simultaneously controlling for various confounders at both the individual-level and area-level, whereas previous studies only considered one of the two levels. The purpose of this study is therefore to examine the associations between social capital and health by using multilevel analysis after controlling for various confounders both at the individual and area-levels (i.e., concentrated disadvantage) in non-western countries.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2010 to April 2011 in Seoul, South Korea. The target population included respondents aged 25 years and older who have resided in the same administrative area since 2008. The final sample for this study consisted of 4,730 respondents within all 25 of Seoul's administrative areas.
In our final model, individual-level social capital, including network sources (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.11-1.37) and organizational participation (OR = 2.55; 95% CI = 2.11-3.08) was positively associated with good/very good health. Interestingly, the individual × area organizational participation cross-level interaction was negatively associated with good/very good health (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.32-0.50), indicating that in areas with higher organizational participation, individuals with high organizational participation were less likely to report good/very good health when compared to low organizational participation individuals.
Our study provides evidence that individual-level social capital is associated with self-reported health, even after controlling for both individual and area-level confounders. Although this study did not find significant relationships between area-level organizational participation and self-reported health, this study found the cross-level interaction for social capital. Hence, in areas with lower organizational participation, the probability of reporting good/very good health is higher for individuals with high organizational participation than individuals with low organizational participation. This study, albeit tentatively, suggests that policy makers should focus upon social capital when making policies which aim to enhance one's health.
本研究旨在解决先前研究的两个局限性。首先,由于仅有少数研究检验了社会资本,且这些研究都来自非西方国家,因此,在亚洲背景下,这个在西方社会发展起来的概念是否同样适用还不确定。其次,本研究考虑了个体层面、区域层面以及交叉层面的社会资本,并在同时控制个体层面和区域层面各种混杂因素的情况下,检验了其与健康的关系,而先前的研究仅考虑了其中一个层面。因此,本研究的目的是在非西方国家,通过同时控制个体层面和区域层面(即集中劣势)的各种混杂因素,使用多层次分析来检验社会资本与健康之间的关系。
我们于 2010 年 12 月至 2011 年 4 月在韩国首尔进行了一项横断面调查。目标人群包括自 2008 年以来在同一行政区域居住的 25 岁及以上的受访者。本研究的最终样本由首尔 25 个行政区域内的 4730 名受访者组成。
在我们的最终模型中,个体层面的社会资本,包括网络来源(OR = 1.23;95%CI = 1.11-1.37)和组织参与(OR = 2.55;95%CI = 2.11-3.08)与良好/非常好的健康状况呈正相关。有趣的是,个体×区域组织参与交叉水平交互作用与良好/非常好的健康状况呈负相关(OR = 0.40;95%CI = 0.32-0.50),表明在组织参与度较高的区域,与组织参与度较低的个体相比,组织参与度较高的个体报告良好/非常好的健康状况的可能性较小。
本研究提供了证据表明,即使在同时控制个体和区域层面混杂因素的情况下,个体层面的社会资本与自我报告的健康状况相关。虽然本研究未发现区域层面组织参与与自我报告的健康状况之间存在显著关系,但本研究发现了社会资本的交叉水平交互作用。因此,在组织参与度较低的区域,组织参与度较高的个体报告良好/非常好的健康状况的概率高于组织参与度较低的个体。虽然这只是初步研究,但该研究表明,政策制定者在制定旨在提高人们健康的政策时,应该关注社会资本。