• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多西环素-链霉素、多西环素-利福平与氧氟沙星-利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison of doxycycline-streptomycin, doxycycline-rifampin, and ofloxacin-rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;16(4):e247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.003
PMID:22296864
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional regimens for the treatment of brucellosis are associated with significant relapse rates. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ofloxacin plus rifampin (OFX-RIF) versus doxycycline plus streptomycin (DOX-STR) and doxycycline plus rifampin (DOX-RIF) regimens in the treatment of brucellosis.

METHODS

Two hundred and nineteen patients with brucellosis were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial; 28 cases were withdrawn because they did not attend the follow-up. Out of 191 patients with brucellosis, 64 received OFX-RIF, 62 received DOX-RIF, and 65 patients received DOX-STR regimens. All patients were assessed during the period of therapy in the second, fourth, and sixth weeks by clinical course and were also followed up clinically and serologically for 6 months after the cessation of therapy.

RESULTS

The highest clinical response (95.4%) was observed in the DOX-STR group (p=0.009). The results of multivariate analysis indicate that treatment with DOX-STR had the least therapeutic failures among the three groups (p=0.033). Adverse reactions were seen in 16.8% of patients, but there was no significant difference among the three groups (p=0.613). The lowest relapse rate (4.6%) was observed in the DOX-STR group (p=0.109).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the DOX-STR combination should remain the first-line regimen for the treatment of brucellosis in our region; we recommend DOX-RIF and OFX-RIF combinations as the second-line regimens.

摘要

背景

传统的布鲁氏菌病治疗方案与较高的复发率相关。本研究旨在比较氧氟沙星联合利福平(OFX-RIF)、多西环素联合链霉素(DOX-STR)和多西环素联合利福平(DOX-RIF)方案治疗布鲁氏菌病的疗效。

方法

219 例布鲁氏菌病患者参加了一项随机临床试验,28 例因失访而被排除。191 例布鲁氏菌病患者中,64 例接受 OFX-RIF 治疗,62 例接受 DOX-RIF 治疗,65 例接受 DOX-STR 治疗。所有患者在治疗的第 2、4 和 6 周通过临床病程进行评估,并在治疗停止后 6 个月进行临床和血清学随访。

结果

DOX-STR 组的临床反应率最高(95.4%)(p=0.009)。多变量分析结果表明,DOX-STR 治疗组的治疗失败率最低(p=0.033)。三组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(p=0.613)。DOX-STR 组的复发率最低(4.6%)(p=0.109)。

结论

我们得出结论,DOX-STR 联合治疗方案应继续作为本地区布鲁氏菌病的一线治疗方案;我们推荐 DOX-RIF 和 OFX-RIF 联合治疗方案作为二线治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Comparison of doxycycline-streptomycin, doxycycline-rifampin, and ofloxacin-rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial.多西环素-链霉素、多西环素-利福平与氧氟沙星-利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;16(4):e247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
2
Ofloxacin plus rifampicin versus doxycycline plus rifampicin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial [ISRCTN11871179].氧氟沙星联合利福平与多西环素联合利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的随机临床试验[ISRCTN11871179]
BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 23;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-18.
3
Comparison between doxycycline-rifampin-amikacin and doxycycline-rifampin regimens in the treatment of brucellosis.多西环素-利福平-阿米卡星与多西环素-利福平方案治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;11(2):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
4
Comparison of three different combination therapies in the treatment of human brucellosis.三种不同联合疗法治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较
Trop Doct. 2005 Oct;35(4):210-2. doi: 10.1258/004947505774938765.
5
[A comparative therapeutic and multicenter trial of rifampicin and doxycycline versus streptomycin and doxycycline in human brucellosis].利福平与强力霉素对比链霉素与强力霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的多中心对照试验
Med Clin (Barc). 1991 May 4;96(17):649-53.
6
Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-rifampin-gentamicin in treatment of human brucellosis.多西环素-利福平与多西环素-利福平-庆大霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较
Trop Doct. 2012 Jan;42(1):13-7. doi: 10.1258/td.2011.110284.
7
Efficacy of rifampicin plus doxycycline versus rifampicin plus quinolone in the treatment of brucellosis.利福平联合多西环素与利福平联合喹诺酮治疗布鲁氏菌病的疗效比较
Saudi Med J. 2002 Aug;23(8):921-4.
8
Efficacy of gentamicin plus doxycycline versus streptomycin plus doxycycline in the treatment of brucellosis in humans.庆大霉素联合多西环素与链霉素联合多西环素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的疗效比较
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1075-80. doi: 10.1086/501359. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
9
Comparison of two durations of triple-drug therapy in patients with uncomplicated brucellosis: A randomized controlled trial.单纯性布鲁氏菌病患者三联药物治疗两种疗程的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;46(8):573-7. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2014.918275. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
10
Therapy of experimental murine brucellosis with streptomycin alone and in combination with ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and rifampin.单用链霉素以及链霉素与环丙沙星、强力霉素和利福平联合治疗实验性小鼠布鲁氏菌病。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Nov;37(11):2333-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.11.2333.

引用本文的文献

1
Brucellosis: Bacteriology, pathogenesis, epidemiology and role of the metallophores in virulence: a review.布鲁氏菌病:细菌学、发病机制、流行病学及金属离子载体在毒力中的作用:综述
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jul 8;15:1621230. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1621230. eCollection 2025.
2
A Systematic Review and Analysis of Brucella Endocarditis Cases.布鲁氏菌性心内膜炎病例的系统评价与分析
Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 Mar;29(3):111-117. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.4259.
3
Spatio-temporal analysis of human brucellosis distribution in Neyshabur, Iran from 2015 to 2022, a cross-sectional study.
2015年至2022年伊朗内沙布尔人类布鲁氏菌病分布的时空分析,一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 18;20(2):e0318503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318503. eCollection 2025.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies on antibiotic treatment of brucellosis.系统评价和荟萃分析比较临床研究抗生素治疗布鲁氏菌病。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 16;14(1):19037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69669-w.
5
Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗人类布鲁氏菌病策略的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Mar 11;18(3):e0012010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Two Perioperative Chemotherapy Regimens for Lumbar Brucellosis.两种围手术期化疗方案治疗腰椎布鲁氏菌病疗效的对比研究。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Nov 27;17:3523-3536. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S427477. eCollection 2023.
7
Small Molecule Inhibitors against the Bacterial Pathogen .小分子抑制剂对抗细菌病原体。
Curr Med Chem. 2024;31(27):4267-4285. doi: 10.2174/0929867331666230915153910.
8
Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.三联抗生素疗法治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的疗效更好:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Sep 14;17(9):e0011590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Co-Delivery of Doxycycline and Hydroxychloroquine Using CdTe-Labeled Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Treatment of Acute and Chronic Brucellosis.使用碲化镉标记的固体脂质纳米粒共递送强力霉素和羟氯喹用于治疗急慢性布鲁氏菌病
Front Chem. 2022 May 11;10:890252. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.890252. eCollection 2022.
10
Combination of doxycycline, streptomycin and hydroxychloroquine for short-course treatment of brucellosis: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.多西环素、链霉素和羟氯喹联合短程治疗布鲁氏菌病的单盲随机临床试验。
Infection. 2022 Oct;50(5):1267-1271. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01806-x. Epub 2022 Mar 30.