Suppr超能文献

是否应常规采用微创方法进行复杂二尖瓣修复术?

Should complex mitral valve repair be routinely performed using a minimally invasive approach?

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012 Mar;27(2):118-24. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328350214f.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review selected recent publications on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery to help answer the question as to whether the minimally invasive approach should be routinely used in complex mitral valve repairs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Other than cosmesis, there have not been demonstrable reproducible benefits of the minimally invasive approach. Although some workers report excellent results, there are other data that raise concern that complex repairs are less likely to be undertaken via the minimal access approach, resulting in lower repair rates, and also that the incidence of residual regurgitation may be higher. Some complications, such as stroke, may occur with greater frequency in patients having the minimally invasive approach.

SUMMARY

The minimally invasive approach for complex mitral valve repair requires continued development and investigation, and current application should probably be largely restricted to high-volume reference minimally invasive surgery centers.

摘要

目的综述

回顾微创二尖瓣手术的部分近期文献,以帮助解答微创方法是否应常规应用于复杂二尖瓣修复术的问题。

最新发现

除美容效果外,微创方法尚未表现出可复制的明显优势。尽管一些研究人员报告了优异的结果,但其他数据表明,微创入路不太可能用于复杂修复,导致修复率降低,且残余反流的发生率可能更高。某些并发症,如中风,在接受微创方法的患者中可能更常见。

总结

对于复杂二尖瓣修复的微创方法需要持续发展和研究,目前的应用可能主要局限于大容量的参考微创外科中心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验