Suppr超能文献

双能 X 射线吸收法在腹主动脉钙化评估中的应用。

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the evaluation of abdominal aortic calcifications.

机构信息

Imaging Division, Clinical Department of Radiological and Histocytopathological Sciences, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2012 Apr-Jun;15(2):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment vs digital radiography (DR) in the detection and scoring of abdominal aortic calcifications (AACs). Seventy-five patients with indication for morphometric evaluation of the spine underwent vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and spinal DR (gold standard). The radiographic and VFA images were analyzed to detect AAC using a previously validated 24-point scale (AAC-24) and a simplified 8-point scale (AAC-8). The evaluation was conducted by 2 expert radiologists and repeated by the more experienced of the 2 after 7d to verify the results. Patients with a score of 5 or more in AAC-24 and 3 or more in AAC-8 were considered at risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The aorta was not completely visible in 11 VFA and 1 DR images. DR detected AAC in 42 of the 63 patients (66.7%), whereas 15 patients (23.8%) were considered at risk for CVD. The VFA showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of AAC with values of 78.6%, 85.7%, and 81.0%, respectively, with both AAC-24 and AAC-8; in the identification of patients at risk for CVD, VFA demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, with values of 86.7%, 100%, and 96.8% using AAC-24 and 86.7%, 93.8%, and 92.1% using AAC-8. In the detection of AAC, intraobserver agreement was superimposable using both the techniques (κ=1.00), whereas in the identification of patients at risk for CVD, kappa values were 0.96 and 0.95 using AAC-24 and 1.00 and 0.96 using AAC-8 for DR and VFA, respectively. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of the presence/absence of AAC showed a kappa value of 0.76 for DR and 0.71 for VFA, whereas kappa values of 0.91 and 0.87 for DR and 0.85 and 0.83 for VFA were achieved for CVD risk using AAC-24 and AAC-8, respectively. AAC can be easily and accurately diagnosed by VFA with satisfactory accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability. VFA may be used in the assessment and monitoring of AAC.

摘要

本研究旨在评估新型双能 X 射线吸收仪设备与数字射线照相术(DR)在检测和评分腹主动脉钙化(AAC)中的诊断性能。75 例有脊柱形态计量评估指征的患者接受了椎体骨折评估(VFA)和脊柱 DR(金标准)检查。使用先前验证的 24 点评分(AAC-24)和简化的 8 点评分(AAC-8)对放射和 VFA 图像进行分析以检测 AAC。由 2 名专家放射科医生进行评估,并在 7 天后由经验更丰富的 2 名放射科医生重复评估以验证结果。AAC-24 评分为 5 分或以上和 AAC-8 评分为 3 分或以上的患者被认为有患心血管疾病(CVD)的风险。11 个 VFA 和 1 个 DR 图像中主动脉不完全可见。DR 在 63 例患者中的 42 例中检测到 AAC,而 15 例(23.8%)被认为有患 CVD 的风险。VFA 在检测 AAC 时的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为 78.6%、85.7%和 81.0%,使用 AAC-24 和 AAC-8 时均如此;在识别有 CVD 风险的患者时,VFA 分别具有 86.7%、100%和 96.8%的灵敏度、特异性和准确性,使用 AAC-24 和 86.7%、93.8%和 92.1%的准确性,使用 AAC-8。在检测 AAC 时,两种技术的观察者间一致性可叠加(κ=1.00),而在识别有 CVD 风险的患者时,使用 AAC-24 时 DR 和 VFA 的κ 值分别为 0.96 和 0.95,而使用 AAC-8 时则分别为 1.00 和 0.96。DR 评估 AAC 有无的观察者间一致性的κ 值为 0.76,VFA 的κ 值为 0.71,而使用 AAC-24 和 AAC-8 时,DR 和 VFA 分别为 0.91 和 0.87,0.85 和 0.83。VFA 可用于 AAC 的评估和监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验