Wen Ning, Walls Nicole, Kim Jinkoo, Jin Jian-Yue, Kim Sangroh, Nurushev Teamour, Chetty Indrin J, Movsas Benjamin, Ryu Samuel
Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;11(2):123-31. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500241.
The recently released Novalis TX linac platform provides various image guided localization methods including a stereoscopic X-ray imaging technique (ExacTrac) and a volumetric cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging technique. The ExacTrac combined with the robotic six dimensional (6D) couch provides fast and accurate patient setup based on bony structures and offers "snap shot" imaging at any point during the treatment to detect patient motion. The CBCT offers a three dimensional (3D), volumetric image of the patient's setup with visualization of anatomic structures. However, each imaging system has a separate isocenter, which may not coincide with each other or with the linac isocenter. The aim of this paper was to compare the localization accuracy between Exactrac and CBCT for single fraction spine radiosurgery treatments. The study was performed for both phantom and patients (96 clinical treatments of 57 patients). The discrepancies between the isocenter between the ExacTrac and CBCT in four dimensions (three translations and one rotation) were recorded and statistically analyzed using two-tailed t-test.
最近推出的诺瓦利斯TX直线加速器平台提供了多种图像引导定位方法,包括立体X射线成像技术(ExacTrac)和容积式锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像技术。ExacTrac与机器人六维(6D)治疗床相结合,可基于骨骼结构快速准确地进行患者摆位,并在治疗过程中的任何时刻提供“快照”成像,以检测患者运动。CBCT提供患者摆位的三维(3D)容积图像,并能显示解剖结构。然而,每个成像系统都有各自独立的等中心,它们可能彼此不重合,也可能与直线加速器的等中心不重合。本文的目的是比较ExacTrac和CBCT在单次分割脊柱放射外科治疗中的定位准确性。该研究在体模和患者身上均进行了(对57例患者进行了96次临床治疗)。记录了ExacTrac和CBCT的等中心在四个维度(三个平移和一个旋转)上的差异,并使用双尾t检验进行统计分析。