Smith Caroline A, Levett Kate M, Collins Carmel T, Jones Leanne
Centre forComplementaryMedicine Research,University ofWestern Sydney, Penrith SouthDC, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub2.
Many women would like to avoid pharmacological or invasive methods of pain management in labour, and this may contribute towards the popularity of complementary methods of pain management. This review examined currently available evidence supporting the use of manual healing methods including massage and reflexology for pain management in labour.
To examine the effects of manual healing methods including massage and reflexology for pain management in labour on maternal and perinatal morbidity.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2 of 4), MEDLINE (1966 to 30 June 2011), CINAHL (1980 to 30 June 2011), the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (30 June 2011), Chinese Clinical Trial Register (30 June 2011), Current Controlled Trials (30 June 2011), ClinicalTrials.gov, (30 June 2011) ISRCTN Register (30 June 2011), National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) (30 June 2011) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (30 June 2011).
Randomised controlled trials comparing manual healing methods with standard care, no treatment, other non-pharmacological forms of pain management in labour or placebo.
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We attempted to contact study authors for additional information.
We included six trials, with data reporting on five trials and 326 women in the meta-analysis. We found trials for massage only. Less pain during labour was reported from massage compared with usual care during the first stage of labour (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.17 to -0.47), four trials, 225 women), and labour pain was reduced in one trial of massage compared with music (risk ratio (RR) 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.89, 101 women). One trial of massage compared with usual care found reduced anxiety during the first stage of labour (MD -16.27, 95% CI -27.03 to -5.51, 60 women). No trial was assessed as being at a low risk of bias for all quality domains.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Massage may have a role in reducing pain, and improving women's emotional experience of labour. However, there is a need for further research.
许多女性希望避免分娩时使用药物或侵入性疼痛管理方法,这可能促使补充性疼痛管理方法更受欢迎。本综述考察了目前支持使用包括按摩和反射疗法在内的手法治疗方法进行分娩疼痛管理的现有证据。
考察包括按摩和反射疗法在内的手法治疗方法用于分娩疼痛管理对孕产妇和围产期发病率的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2011年6月30日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2011年第2期,共4期)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE,1966年至2011年6月30日)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL,1980年至2011年6月30日)、澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册库(2011年6月30日)、中国临床试验注册中心(2011年6月30日)、当前对照试验库(2011年6月30日)、美国国立医学图书馆临床试验数据库(ClinicalTrials.gov,2011年6月30日)、国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN Register,2011年6月30日)、美国国立补充与替代医学中心(NCCAM,2011年6月30日)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(2011年6月30日)。
比较手法治疗方法与标准护理、不治疗、其他分娩时非药物性疼痛管理形式或安慰剂的随机对照试验。
两位作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们试图联系研究作者以获取更多信息。
我们纳入了6项试验,荟萃分析中有5项试验的数据报告,涉及326名女性。我们仅找到关于按摩的试验。与第一产程的常规护理相比,按摩组报告的分娩疼痛较轻(标准化均数差(SMD)-0.82,95%置信区间(CI)-1.17至-0.47,4项试验,225名女性),在一项按摩与音乐对比的试验中,按摩组的分娩疼痛减轻(风险比(RR)0.40,95%CI 0.18至0.89,101名女性)。一项按摩与常规护理对比的试验发现,第一产程中按摩组的焦虑减轻(均差(MD)-16.27,95%CI -27.03至-5.51,60名女性)。没有一项试验在所有质量领域被评估为低偏倚风险。
按摩可能在减轻疼痛以及改善女性分娩时的情绪体验方面发挥作用。然而,仍需要进一步的研究。