• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同基因型蜜蜂的混合会影响个体工蜂的行为和神经元基质中基因的转录。

Mixing of honeybees with different genotypes affects individual worker behavior and transcription of genes in the neuronal substrate.

机构信息

Department of Genetics, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031653. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0031653
PMID:22348118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3279409/
Abstract

Division of labor in social insects has made the evolution of collective traits possible that cannot be achieved by individuals alone. Differences in behavioral responses produce variation in engagement in behavioral tasks, which as a consequence, generates a division of labor. We still have little understanding of the genetic components influencing these behaviors, although several candidate genomic regions and genes influencing individual behavior have been identified. Here, we report that mixing of worker honeybees with different genotypes influences the expression of individual worker behaviors and the transcription of genes in the neuronal substrate. These indirect genetic effects arise in a colony because numerous interactions between workers produce interacting phenotypes and genotypes across organisms. We studied hygienic behavior of honeybee workers, which involves the cleaning of diseased brood cells in the colony. We mixed ∼500 newly emerged honeybee workers with genotypes of preferred Low (L) and High (H) hygienic behaviors. The L/H genotypic mixing affected the behavioral engagement of L worker bees in a hygienic task, the cooperation among workers in uncapping single brood cells, and switching between hygienic tasks. We found no evidence that recruiting and task-related stimuli are the primary source of the indirect genetic effects on behavior. We suggested that behavioral responsiveness of L bees was affected by genotypic mixing and found evidence for changes in the brain in terms of 943 differently expressed genes. The functional categories of cell adhesion, cellular component organization, anatomical structure development, protein localization, developmental growth and cell morphogenesis were overrepresented in this set of 943 genes, suggesting that indirect genetic effects can play a role in modulating and modifying the neuronal substrate. Our results suggest that genotypes of social partners affect the behavioral responsiveness and the neuronal substrate of individual workers, indicating a complex genetic architecture underlying the expression of behavior.

摘要

社会昆虫的分工使得集体特征的进化成为可能,而这些特征单凭个体是无法实现的。行为反应的差异产生了行为任务参与的差异,进而产生了分工。尽管已经确定了几个影响个体行为的候选基因组区域和基因,但我们对影响这些行为的遗传成分仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们报告说,不同基因型的工蜂混合会影响个体工蜂行为的表达和神经元基质中基因的转录。这些间接遗传效应是在一个群体中产生的,因为工蜂之间的大量相互作用会在生物体之间产生相互作用的表型和基因型。我们研究了蜜蜂工蜂的卫生行为,它涉及到清理群体中患病的幼虫细胞。我们将约 500 只新出现的蜜蜂工蜂与偏好低(L)和高(H)卫生行为的基因型混合。L/H 基因型混合影响了 L 工蜂从事卫生任务的行为参与度、工蜂间在单个幼虫细胞上开顶的合作度,以及在卫生任务之间的切换。我们没有证据表明招募和与任务相关的刺激是对行为产生间接遗传效应的主要来源。我们认为,L 蜜蜂的行为反应能力受到基因型混合的影响,并发现了证据表明大脑在 943 个表达不同的基因方面发生了变化。细胞粘附、细胞成分组织、解剖结构发育、蛋白质定位、发育生长和细胞形态发生的功能类别在这 943 个基因中过表达,这表明间接遗传效应可以在调节和修饰神经元基质方面发挥作用。我们的研究结果表明,社会伙伴的基因型会影响个体工蜂的行为反应能力和神经元基质,这表明行为表达的背后存在复杂的遗传结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/b82f552133b4/pone.0031653.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/ca2eca15e2d3/pone.0031653.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/a925ca1fe56a/pone.0031653.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/adcfbd16795d/pone.0031653.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/b82f552133b4/pone.0031653.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/ca2eca15e2d3/pone.0031653.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/a925ca1fe56a/pone.0031653.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/adcfbd16795d/pone.0031653.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/3279409/b82f552133b4/pone.0031653.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mixing of honeybees with different genotypes affects individual worker behavior and transcription of genes in the neuronal substrate.不同基因型蜜蜂的混合会影响个体工蜂的行为和神经元基质中基因的转录。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031653. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
2
Differences between uncapping and removal behaviors in Apis cerana from the perspective of long non-coding RNAs.从长非编码 RNA 的角度看中华蜜蜂的去盖和移除行为的差异。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Sep 30;25(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10817-x.
3
Maternal effects on the hygienic behavior of Russian x Ontario hybrid honeybees (Apis mellifera L.).母体效应对俄罗斯 x 安大略杂交蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)卫生行为的影响。
J Hered. 2010 Jan-Feb;101(1):91-6. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esp092.
4
Behavioral and molecular studies of quantitative differences in hygienic behavior in honeybees.蜜蜂卫生行为数量差异的行为学与分子学研究
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Oct 21;9(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2269-y.
5
Six quantitative trait loci influence task thresholds for hygienic behaviour in honeybees (Apis mellifera).六个数量性状位点影响蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)卫生行为的任务阈值。
Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr;19(7):1452-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04569.x. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
6
Honeybee social regulatory networks are shaped by colony-level selection.蜜蜂的社会调节网络是由群体水平的选择塑造的。
Am Nat. 2009 Mar;173(3):E99-E107. doi: 10.1086/596527.
7
Genome-Wide Association Study of a Varroa-Specific Defense Behavior in Honeybees (Apis mellifera).蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)针对瓦螨的特定防御行为的全基因组关联研究。
J Hered. 2016 May;107(3):220-7. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esw005. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
8
Effects of immunostimulation on social behavior, chemical communication and genome-wide gene expression in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera).免疫刺激对工蜂(Apis mellifera)社会行为、化学通讯和全基因组基因表达的影响。
BMC Genomics. 2012 Oct 16;13:558. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-558.
9
Differential gene expression between hygienic and non-hygienic honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) hives.卫生型和非卫生型蜜蜂(意大利蜜蜂)蜂群之间的基因差异表达
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jul 7;16(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1714-y.
10
Altruistic behavior by egg-laying worker honeybees.产卵工蜂的利他行为。
Curr Biol. 2013 Aug 19;23(16):1574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.045. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual and social heterosis act independently in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies.个体杂种优势和社会杂种优势在蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)蜂群中独立起作用。
J Hered. 2025 Jan 3;116(1):54-61. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esae043.
2
A complete absence of indirect genetic effects on brain gene expression in a highly social context.在高度社交的环境中,间接遗传效应对大脑基因表达没有影响。
Mol Ecol. 2022 Nov;31(21):5602-5607. doi: 10.1111/mec.16686. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
3
Selection on heritable social network positions is context-dependent in Drosophila melanogaster.

本文引用的文献

1
INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS.相互作用的表型与进化过程:I. 社会相互作用的直接和间接遗传效应
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1352-1362. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01458.x.
2
Self-organization in social insects.社会性昆虫的自组织行为。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 May;12(5):188-93. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01048-3.
3
Pheromones in a superorganism: from gene to social regulation.信息素在超个体中的作用:从基因到社会调控。
可遗传的社会网络位置选择在黑腹果蝇中具有情境依赖性。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 7;12(1):3357. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23672-1.
4
Automated computer-based detection of encounter behaviours in groups of honeybees.基于计算机的蜜蜂群体中相遇行为的自动检测
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 15;7(1):17663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17863-4.
5
Behavioral and molecular studies of quantitative differences in hygienic behavior in honeybees.蜜蜂卫生行为数量差异的行为学与分子学研究
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Oct 21;9(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2269-y.
6
The transcriptomic and evolutionary signature of social interactions regulating honey bee caste development.调节蜜蜂级型发育的社会互动的转录组学和进化特征。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Oct 8;5(21):4795-807. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1720. eCollection 2015 Nov.
7
Antennae hold a key to Varroa-sensitive hygiene behaviour in honey bees.触角是蜜蜂对瓦螨敏感卫生行为的关键所在。
Sci Rep. 2015 May 22;5:10454. doi: 10.1038/srep10454.
Vitam Horm. 2010;83:401-23. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(10)83017-1.
4
Six quantitative trait loci influence task thresholds for hygienic behaviour in honeybees (Apis mellifera).六个数量性状位点影响蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)卫生行为的任务阈值。
Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr;19(7):1452-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04569.x. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
5
Brain plasticity in Diptera and Hymenoptera.双翅目和膜翅目的脑可塑性
Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2010 Jan 1;2(1):268-88. doi: 10.2741/s63.
6
Adaptation and the genetics of social behaviour.适应与社会行为的遗传学
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3209-16. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0108.
7
Honey bee aggression supports a link between gene regulation and behavioral evolution.蜜蜂的攻击性支持了基因调控与行为进化之间的联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15400-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907043106. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
8
Modulated modularity clustering as an exploratory tool for functional genomic inference.调制模块化聚类作为功能基因组推断的探索工具。
PLoS Genet. 2009 May;5(5):e1000479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000479. Epub 2009 May 8.
9
Co-regulated transcriptional networks contribute to natural genetic variation in Drosophila sleep.共同调控的转录网络促成了果蝇睡眠中的自然遗传变异。
Nat Genet. 2009 Mar;41(3):371-5. doi: 10.1038/ng.330. Epub 2009 Feb 22.
10
Honeybee social regulatory networks are shaped by colony-level selection.蜜蜂的社会调节网络是由群体水平的选择塑造的。
Am Nat. 2009 Mar;173(3):E99-E107. doi: 10.1086/596527.