Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, and St. Mary's Research Centre, Montréal, Que.
CMAJ. 2012 Apr 3;184(6):E307-16. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111069. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
Many studies have shown the tendency for people without a regular care provider or primary physician to make greater use of emergency departments. We sought to determine the effects of three aspects of care provided by primary physicians (physician specialty, continuity of care and comprehensiveness of care) on their patients' use of the emergency department.
Using provincial administrative databases, we created a cohort of 367,315 adults aged 18 years and older. Participants were residents of urban areas of Quebec. Affiliation with a primary physician, the specialty of this physician (i.e., family physician v. specialist), continuity of care (as measured using the Usual Provider Continuity index) and comprehensiveness of care (i.e., number of complete annual examinations) were measured among participants (n = 311,701) who had visited a physician three or more times during a two-year baseline period. We used multivariable negative binomial regression to investigate the relationships between measures of care and the number of visits to emergency departments during a 12-month follow-up period.
Among participants under 65 years of age, emergency department use was higher for those not affiliated than for those affiliated with a family physician (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.16) or a specialist (IRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17). Among patients aged 65 years and older, having a specialist primary physician, as opposed to a family physician, predicted increased use of the emergency department (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17). Greater continuity of care with a family physician predicted less use of the emergency department only among participants who made 25 or more visits to a physician during the baseline period. Greater continuity of care with a specialist predicted less use of the emergency department overall, particularly among participants with intermediate numbers of multimorbidities and admissions to hospital. Greater comprehensiveness of care by family physicians predicted less use of the emergency department.
Efforts to increase the proportion of adults affiliated with a family physician should target older adults, people who visit physicians more frequently and people with multiple comorbidities and admissions to hospital.
许多研究表明,没有固定医疗服务提供者或初级医生的人更倾向于使用急诊室。我们旨在确定初级医生提供的三个方面的医疗服务(医生专业、医疗连续性和医疗全面性)对其患者使用急诊室的影响。
我们使用省级行政数据库创建了一个由 367315 名 18 岁及以上成年人组成的队列。参与者为魁北克城市地区的居民。通过对参与者(n=311701)在两年基线期内三次或以上就诊的情况进行分析,评估他们与初级医生的关系、该医生的专业(家庭医生与专科医生)、医疗连续性(使用常规提供者连续性指数测量)和医疗全面性(即每年完成的完整检查次数)。我们使用多变量负二项回归分析来研究医疗服务措施与 12 个月随访期间急诊室就诊次数之间的关系。
在 65 岁以下的参与者中,与与家庭医生(发病率比[IRR]1.11,95%置信区间[CI]1.05-1.16)或专科医生(IRR 1.10,95%CI 1.04-1.17)建立联系的参与者相比,没有与医生建立联系的参与者急诊室就诊率更高。在 65 岁及以上的患者中,与家庭医生相比,选择专科医生作为初级医生预测急诊室就诊率增加(IRR 1.13,95%CI 1.09-1.17)。仅在基线期内就诊 25 次或以上的参与者中,与家庭医生的医疗连续性更高可预测急诊室就诊率更低。与专科医生的医疗连续性更高可预测总体上急诊室就诊率更低,尤其是在有中等数量合并症和住院的患者中。家庭医生提供的医疗全面性更高可预测急诊室就诊率更低。
增加与家庭医生建立联系的成年人比例的努力应针对老年人、就诊频率更高的人以及患有多种合并症和住院的人。