Suppr超能文献

口腔健康研究中的方法学问题:干预研究。

Methodological issues in oral health research: intervention studies.

机构信息

Oral Health Services Research Centre, University Dental School, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;40 Suppl 1:15-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00661.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To provide a broad overview of methodological issues in the design and evaluation of intervention studies in dental public health, with particular emphasis on explanatory trials, pragmatic trials and complex interventions.

METHODS

We present a narrative summary of selected publications from the literature outlining both historical and recent challenges in the design and evaluation of intervention studies and describe some recent tools that may help researchers to address these challenges.

RESULTS

It is now recognised that few intervention studies in dental public health are purely explanatory or pragmatic. We describe the PRECIS tool which can be used by trialists to assess and display the position of their trial on a continuum between the extremes of explanatory and pragmatic trials. The tool aims to help trialists make design decisions that are in line with their stated aims. The increasingly complex nature of dental public health interventions presents particular design and evaluation challenges. The revised Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for the development and evaluation of complex interventions which emphasises the importance of planning and process evaluation is a welcome development. We briefly describe the MRC guidance and outline some examples of complex interventions in the field of oral health. The role of observational studies in monitoring public health interventions when the conduct of RCTs is not appropriate or feasible is acknowledged. We describe the STROBE statement and outline the implications of the STROBE guidelines for dental public health.

CONCLUSION

The methodological challenges in the design, conduct and reporting of intervention studies in oral health are considerable. The need to provide reliable evidence to support innovative new strategies in oral health policy is a major impetus in these fields. No doubt the 'Methodological Issues in Oral Health Research' group will have further opportunities to highlight this work.

摘要

目的

提供牙科公共卫生领域干预研究设计和评估中方法学问题的概述,特别强调解释性试验、实用性试验和复杂干预措施。

方法

我们从文献中选择了一些出版物进行叙述性总结,概述了干预研究设计和评估中存在的历史和近期挑战,并描述了一些可能有助于研究人员应对这些挑战的新工具。

结果

现在人们认识到,牙科公共卫生领域的干预研究很少是纯粹的解释性或实用性的。我们描述了 PRECIS 工具,试验人员可以使用该工具来评估和展示其试验在解释性和实用性试验之间的连续体中的位置。该工具旨在帮助试验人员做出符合其既定目标的设计决策。牙科公共卫生干预措施的性质日益复杂,给设计和评估带来了特殊的挑战。修订后的医学研究理事会(MRC)复杂干预措施发展和评估指南强调了规划和过程评估的重要性,这是一个受欢迎的发展。我们简要描述了 MRC 指南,并概述了口腔健康领域的一些复杂干预措施示例。当进行 RCT 不适当或不可行时,观察性研究在监测公共卫生干预措施方面的作用得到了承认。我们描述了 STROBE 声明,并概述了 STROBE 指南对牙科公共卫生的影响。

结论

口腔健康干预研究在设计、实施和报告方面存在相当大的方法学挑战。为创新性的口腔健康政策新策略提供可靠证据是这些领域的主要推动力。毫无疑问,“口腔健康研究方法学问题”小组将有更多机会突出这项工作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验