St. Elizabeth Health Center, Youngstown, OH 44501-1790, USA.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;27(2):150-92. doi: 10.1177/0884533612439896. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
The currently available, standard soybean oil (SO)-based intravenous fat emulsions (IVFEs) meet the needs of most parenteral nutrition (PN) patients. There are alternative oil-based fat emulsions, such as medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), olive oils (OOs), and fish oils (FOs), that, based on extensive usage in Europe, have an equivalent safety profile to SO. These alternative IVFEs are metabolized via different pathways, which may lead to less proinflammatory effects and less immune suppression. These alternative oil-based IVFEs are not currently available in the United States. Many patients who require IVFEs are already in a compromised state. Such patients could potentially have better clinical outcomes when receiving one of the alternative IVFEs to diminish the intake of the potentially proinflammatory ω-6 fatty acid-linoleic acid-which comprises more than 50% of the fatty acid profile in SO. Further research is needed on these alternative oil-based IVFEs to identify which IVFE oils or which combination of oils may be most clinically useful for specific patient populations.
目前可获得的标准大豆油(SO)静脉内脂肪乳剂(IVFE)满足大多数肠外营养(PN)患者的需求。还有其他油基脂肪乳剂,如中链甘油三酯(MCT)、橄榄油(OO)和鱼油(FO),基于在欧洲的广泛使用,它们与 SO 具有同等的安全性。这些替代的 IVFE 通过不同的途径代谢,这可能导致较少的促炎作用和较少的免疫抑制。这些替代的油基 IVFE 目前在美国不可用。许多需要 IVFE 的患者已经处于脆弱状态。当接受替代 IVFE 之一以减少潜在促炎ω-6 脂肪酸-亚油酸的摄入时,这些患者可能会有更好的临床结果,亚油酸占 SO 脂肪酸谱的 50%以上。需要对这些替代的油基 IVFE 进行进一步研究,以确定哪种 IVFE 油或哪种油的组合可能对特定患者群体最具临床用途。