Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
Self-etch adhesives are well adopted in general practice, obviously primarily thanks to their ease of use and fast application time. Nevertheless, phosphoric acid is still often recommended to beforehand etch enamel following a so-called 'selective' enamel-etch technique, this in particular when most cavity margins end in enamel. The purpose of this study was to test if a new one-step adhesive can be applied in a multi-mode manner, this following different, either 'full' or 'selective', self-etch and etch-and-rinse approaches. Specific research hypotheses tested were that prior phosphoric-acid etching did not affect the bonding effectiveness of the one-step adhesive to enamel and dentine, and that the bonding effectiveness to dentine was also not affected when the adhesive was applied either following a 'dry-bonding' or 'wet-bonding' etch-and-rinse technique.
The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of the one-step self-etch adhesive G-Bond Plus (GC, Tokyo, Japan; 1-SEA) was measured when it was bonded to bur-cut enamel following either a 'self-etch' or an 'etch-and-rinse' adhesive protocol, and to bur-cut dentine when applied following either a 'self-etch', a 'dry-bonding' or a 'wet-bonding' etch-and-rinse adhesive protocol. Bond-strength testing was corroborated by ultra-structural analysis of the interfacial interaction at enamel and dentine using transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Prior phosphoric-acid etching significantly increased the bonding effectiveness of the 1-SEA to enamel. A clearly enhanced micro-retentive surface was revealed by TEM. To dentine, no statistically significant difference in bonding effectiveness was recorded when the 1-SEA was either applied following a self-etch or both etch-and-rinse approaches. The 'dry-bonding' etch-and-rinse protocol was significantly more effective than its 'wet-bonding' version. TEM however revealed indications of low-quality hybridisation following both etch-and-rinse approaches, in particular in the form of a porous and poorly resin-infiltrated collagen mesh.
While phosphoric-acid etching definitely improved bonding of the one-step self-etch adhesive to enamel, one should be more careful with additional phosphoric-acid etching of dentine. Although the bond strength was not reduced, the resultant adhesive interface appeared ultra-structurally more vulnerable to biodegradation.
自酸蚀黏合剂在一般实践中得到了很好的应用,这显然主要归功于其使用方便和快速应用的特点。然而,在所谓的“选择性”釉质蚀刻技术之后,磷酸通常仍被推荐用于预先蚀刻釉质,特别是当大多数腔边缘最终在釉质中结束时。本研究的目的是测试一种新的一步式黏合剂是否可以以多种模式应用,这是根据不同的“全”或“选择性”自酸蚀和酸蚀-冲洗方法。具体的研究假设是,磷酸酸蚀前不会影响一步式黏合剂对釉质和牙本质的黏结效果,并且当黏合剂采用“干粘结”或“湿粘结”酸蚀-冲洗技术应用时,对牙本质的黏结效果也不会受到影响。
当一步自酸蚀黏合剂 G-Bond Plus(GC,东京,日本;1-SEA)黏结于 Bur-cut 釉质时,测量其微拉伸黏结强度(μTBS),采用“自酸蚀”或“酸蚀-冲洗”黏合剂方案,当采用“自酸蚀”、“干粘结”或“湿粘结”酸蚀-冲洗黏合剂方案应用于 Bur-cut 牙本质时。通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)对釉质和牙本质的界面相互作用进行超微结构分析,对黏结强度测试进行了佐证。
磷酸酸蚀前显著提高了 1-SEA 对釉质的黏结效果。TEM 显示出明显增强的微观保持表面。对于牙本质,当 1-SEA 采用自酸蚀或酸蚀-冲洗两种方法应用时,黏结效果没有统计学上的显著差异。“干粘结”酸蚀-冲洗方案比其“湿粘结”版本更有效。然而,TEM 显示出两种酸蚀-冲洗方法后,混合质量较差的迹象,特别是表现为多孔和树脂渗透不良的胶原网格。
虽然磷酸酸蚀确实提高了一步自酸蚀黏合剂对釉质的黏结效果,但在对牙本质进行额外的磷酸酸蚀时应更加小心。尽管黏结强度没有降低,但得到的黏结界面在超微结构上更容易受到生物降解的影响。