Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Hospital Dentistry, University of Lausanne School of Medicine, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Mar;107(3):199-202. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60057-2.
The difficulty of identifying the ownership of lost dentures when found is a common and expensive problem in long term care facilities (LTCFs) and hospitals.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of using radiofrequency identification (RFID) in the identification of dentures for LTCF residents after 3 and 6 months.
Thirty-eight residents of 2 LTCFs in Switzerland agreed to participate after providing informed consent. The tag was programmed with the family and first names of the participants and then inserted in the dentures. After placement of the tag, the information was read. A second and third assessment to review the functioning of the tag occurred at 3 and 6 months, and defective tags (if present) were reported and replaced. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
At the 3-month assessment of 34 residents (63 tags) 1 tag was unreadable and 62 tags (98.2%) were operational. At 6 months, the tags of 27 of the enrolled residents (50 tags) were available for review. No examined tag was defective at this time period.
Within the limits of this study (number of patients, 6-month time span) RFID appears to be a reliable method of tracking and identifying dentures, with only 1 of 65 devices being unreadable at 3 months and 100% of 50 initially placed tags being readable at the end of the trial.
在长期护理机构(LTCF)和医院中,找到的丢失义齿的归属问题难以确定,这是一个常见且代价高昂的问题。
本研究的目的是评估在 3 个月和 6 个月后使用射频识别(RFID)对 LTCF 居民义齿进行识别的可靠性。
瑞士的 2 家 LTCF 的 38 名居民在提供知情同意后同意参与。标签上用参与者的姓氏和名字进行编程,然后插入义齿中。放置标签后,读取信息。在 3 个月和 6 个月时进行了第二次和第三次评估,以检查标签的功能,如果存在有缺陷的标签,则会报告并更换。使用描述性统计数据对数据进行分析。
在 34 名居民(63 个标签)的 3 个月评估中,有 1 个标签无法读取,而 62 个标签(98.2%)可以正常工作。在 6 个月时,27 名入组居民(50 个标签)的标签可供评估。在此时间段内,没有检查到有缺陷的标签。
在本研究的限制范围内(患者数量,6 个月的时间跨度),RFID 似乎是一种可靠的跟踪和识别义齿的方法,在 3 个月时有 1 个设备无法读取,而在试验结束时有 100%的最初放置的标签可读取。