Suppr超能文献

探索认知策略使用对改善卒中后目标表现的初步随机对照试验。

Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Jan-Feb;66(1):104-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.001784.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared changes in client performance on three goals poststroke after the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) intervention or standard occupational therapy (SOT) to determine the magnitude and direction of change.

METHOD

Eight people living in the community following a stroke were randomly assigned to receive CO-OP (n = 4) or SOT (n = 4). CO-OP is a 10-session, cognitive-oriented approach to improving performance that uses client-driven cognitive strategies. SOT was therapist driven and combined task-specific and component-based training. Goal performance was measured by the therapist-rated Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS) and the participant-rated Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).

RESULTS

Using Mann-Whitney U test, we found that CO-OP participants showed significantly greater improvement in performance (PQRS, p = .02; COPM Performance, p = .02) compared with SOT but no improvement in satisfaction (COPM Satisfaction, p = .38).

CONCLUSION

The CO-OP group demonstrated larger performance improvements than the SOT group. Because of the promising results, an investigation using a larger sample is warranted.

摘要

目的

作者比较了认知导向日常生活活动治疗(CO-OP)干预或标准作业疗法(SOT)后,脑卒中患者在三个目标上的表现变化,以确定变化的幅度和方向。

方法

8 名居住在社区中的脑卒中患者被随机分配接受 CO-OP(n=4)或 SOT(n=4)治疗。CO-OP 是一种 10 次疗程的、以认知为导向的改善表现的方法,使用以患者为驱动的认知策略。SOT 由治疗师驱动,结合了任务特定和基于组件的训练。目标表现通过治疗师评定的表现质量评定量表(PQRS)和患者自评的加拿大作业表现测量(COPM)进行测量。

结果

使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验,我们发现 CO-OP 组的表现(PQRS,p=0.02;COPM 表现,p=0.02)较 SOT 组有显著的更大改善,但满意度(COPM 满意度,p=0.38)没有改善。

结论

CO-OP 组的表现改善幅度大于 SOT 组。由于结果很有希望,因此需要进行更大样本的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验