Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council, South Africa.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Mar 12;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-8.
Over the past half decade South Africa has been developing, implementing and redeveloping its Lay Health Worker (LHW) policies. Research during this period has highlighted challenges with LHW programme implementation. These challenges have included an increased burden of care for female LHWs. The aim of this study was to explore contemporary LHW policy development processes and the extent to which issues of gender are taken up within this process.
The study adopted a qualitative approach to exploring policy development from the perspective of policy actors. Eleven policy actors (policy makers and policy commentators) were interviewed individually. Data from the interviews were analysed thematically.
Considerations of LHW working conditions drove policy redevelopment. From the interviews it seems that gender as an issue never reached the policy making agenda. Although there was strong recognition that the working conditions of LHWs needed to be improved, poor working conditions were not necessarily seen as a gender concern. Our data suggests that in the process of defining the problem which the redeveloped policy had to address, gender was not included. There was no group or body who brought the issue of gender to the attention of policy developers. As such the issue of gender never entered the policy debates. These debates focused on whether it was appropriate to have LHWs, what LHW programme model should be adopted and whether or not LHWs should be incorporated into the formal health system.
LHW policy redevelopment focused on resolving issues of LHW working conditions through an active process involving many actors and strong debates. Within this process the issue of gender had no champion and never reached the LHW policy agenda. Future research may consider how to incorporate the voices of ordinary women into the policy making process.
在过去的五年中,南非一直在制定、实施和重新制定其初级卫生工作者(LHW)政策。在此期间的研究强调了 LHW 项目实施所面临的挑战。这些挑战包括女性 LHW 承担的护理负担增加。本研究旨在探讨当代 LHW 政策制定过程以及在这一过程中考虑性别问题的程度。
本研究采用定性方法从政策参与者的角度探讨政策制定。对 11 名政策参与者(政策制定者和政策评论员)进行了单独访谈。对访谈数据进行了主题分析。
对 LHW 工作条件的考虑推动了政策的重新制定。从访谈中似乎可以看出,性别问题从未成为政策制定的议题。尽管人们强烈认识到需要改善 LHW 的工作条件,但工作条件差并不一定被视为性别问题。我们的数据表明,在重新制定政策必须解决的问题的过程中,性别问题没有被列入。没有任何团体或机构将性别问题提请政策制定者注意。因此,性别问题从未进入政策辩论。这些辩论集中在是否应该有 LHW、应该采用哪种 LHW 项目模式以及是否应该将 LHW 纳入正式卫生系统。
LHW 政策的重新制定侧重于通过一个涉及许多行为者和激烈辩论的积极过程来解决 LHW 工作条件问题。在这一过程中,性别问题没有拥护者,也从未列入 LHW 政策议程。未来的研究可能会考虑如何将普通妇女的声音纳入决策过程。