Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者的质量调整生命预期——EQ-5D、15D 和 SF-6D 指数评分的比较。

Quality-adjusted life expectancies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis--comparison of index scores from EQ-5D, 15D, and SF-6D.

机构信息

Center for Applied Health Services Research and Technology Assessment, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.09.010. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis generated from three generic health-related quality-of-life instruments.

METHODS

Patients from 11 Danish rheumatology outpatient clinics were asked to report current health status using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D), 15D, and six-dimensional health state short form (derived from SF-12) (SF-6D) instruments. Clinical staff provided data on current disease status (C-reactive protein and Disease Activity Score that involves clinical assessment of 28 joints). National mortality data were retrieved from Statistics Denmark. For each of the three instruments, mean index scores were estimated by gender and 5-year age groups. Partial QALE was estimated for the age interval 30 to 79 years for different subsamples.

RESULTS

Although the three quality-of-life index scores were highly correlated, there were statistically significant differences between the average index scores from the three instruments. The 15D provided the highest index score and SF-6D the lowest score. For a 30-year-old patient, the partial QALE ranged from 37.9 quality-adjusted life-years using the SF-6D to 45.6 quality-adjusted life-years using the 15D. The QALE for men and women differed by 6.2%, 4.0%, and 5.3% when the calculation was based on EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D index scores, respectively. The largest differences were observed when patients were grouped by functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire score), where the EQ-5D showed a 50% difference in index score between the best and worst functional group while the SF-6D and 15D showed smaller differences (32% and 14%, respectively).

DISCUSSION

This analysis has shown the difference in QALE estimates related to different instruments. The study emphasizes that unless outcome studies use the same instruments and scoring algorithms, the results will not be directly comparable.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较三种通用健康相关生活质量工具生成的类风湿关节炎患者的质量调整生命预期(QALE)。

方法

11 个丹麦风湿病门诊的患者被要求使用欧洲五维健康问卷(EQ-5D)、15D 和六维度健康状态简表(SF-12 衍生)(SF-6D)报告当前健康状况。临床工作人员提供了当前疾病状况的数据(C 反应蛋白和涉及 28 个关节临床评估的疾病活动评分)。国家死亡率数据从丹麦统计局检索。对于三种工具中的每一种,通过性别和 5 岁年龄组估计平均指数得分。为不同子样本估计了 30 至 79 岁年龄间隔的部分 QALE。

结果

尽管这三种生活质量指数得分高度相关,但三种工具的平均指数得分存在统计学差异。15D 提供的指数得分最高,SF-6D 提供的指数得分最低。对于 30 岁的患者,使用 SF-6D 的部分 QALE 范围从 37.9 个质量调整生命年到使用 15D 的 45.6 个质量调整生命年。当计算基于 EQ-5D、SF-6D 和 15D 指数得分时,男性和女性的 QALE 分别相差 6.2%、4.0%和 5.3%。当根据功能状态(健康评估问卷评分)对患者进行分组时,差异最大,其中 EQ-5D 在最佳和最差功能组之间的指数得分差异为 50%,而 SF-6D 和 15D 的差异较小(分别为 32%和 14%)。

讨论

本分析表明,不同工具与 QALE 估计值的差异。该研究强调,除非结果研究使用相同的工具和评分算法,否则结果将无法直接比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验