Suppr超能文献

运用儿科转运风险评估(TRAP)评分进行转运处置。

Transport disposition using the Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics (TRAP) score.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8064, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):366-73. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.664246. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Determining appropriate disposition for referred pediatric patients is difficult, since it relies primarily on a telephone description of the patient. In this study, we evaluate the Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics (TRAP) score's ability to assist in appropriate placement of these patients. This novel tool is derived from physiologic variables.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility of calculating a TRAP score and whether a higher score correlates with pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission.

METHODS

We performed an observational study of pediatric patients transported by a specialized team to a tertiary care center and the feasibility of implementing the TRAP tool. Patients were eligible if transported by the pediatric specialty transport team for direct admission to the children's hospital. The TRAP score was obtained either through chart review of the transport team's initial assessment or in real time by the transport team.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients were identified, with 238 patients included in the study. Using logistic regression, higher TRAP scores were associated with PICU admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, p < 0.001). Patients with a higher score were also less likely to leave the PICU within 24 hours (OR 0.79, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TRAP score is a novel objective pediatric transport assessment tool where an elevated score is associated with PICU admission for more than 24 hours. This score may assist with the triage decisions for transported pediatric patients.

摘要

背景

由于主要依赖于对患者的电话描述,因此确定转诊儿科患者的适当处置方式较为困难。在这项研究中,我们评估了儿科转运风险评估(TRAP)评分在帮助这些患者进行适当安置方面的能力。这一新颖的工具源自生理变量。

目的

确定计算 TRAP 评分的可行性,以及较高的评分是否与儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入院相关。

方法

我们对通过专门团队转运至三级医疗中心的儿科患者进行了一项观察性研究,并评估了实施 TRAP 工具的可行性。符合条件的患者是由儿科专业转运团队直接转运至儿童医院的患者。TRAP 评分可通过查看转运团队的初步评估记录,或由转运团队实时获得。

结果

共确定了 269 名患者,其中 238 名患者纳入研究。使用逻辑回归,较高的 TRAP 评分与 PICU 入院相关(比值比 [OR] 1.40,p < 0.001)。评分较高的患者在 24 小时内离开 PICU 的可能性也较低(OR 0.79,p < 0.001)。

结论

TRAP 评分是一种新颖的儿科转运评估工具,评分较高与 PICU 入院超过 24 小时相关。该评分可能有助于对转运的儿科患者进行分诊决策。

相似文献

1
Transport disposition using the Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics (TRAP) score.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):366-73. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.664246. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
2
Utilizing Pediatric Scoring Systems to Predict Disposition During Interfacility Transport.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):249-253. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1491658. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Pediatric Transport-Specific Illness Severity Scores Predict Clinical Deterioration of Transported Patients.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Aug 1;38(8):e1449-e1453. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002789. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Effects of Medical Transport on Outcomes in Children Requiring Intensive Care.
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):889-895. doi: 10.1177/0885066618796460. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
6
The Relationship Between Remoteness and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;18(11):e514-e520. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001318.
7
The Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale algorithm for interfacility transport.
Am J Disaster Med. 2018;13(1):57-63. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2018.0282.
8
The use of a modified pediatric early warning score to assess stability of pediatric patients during transport.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Sep;28(9):878-82. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31826763a3.
9
Retrospective Review of Pediatric Transport: Where Do Our Patients Go After Transport?
Air Med J. 2017 Nov-Dec;36(6):332-338. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
10
Can the need for a physician as part of the pediatric transport team be predicted? A prospective study.
Crit Care Med. 1992 Dec;20(12):1657-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199212000-00009.

本文引用的文献

2
Pediatric specialized transport teams are associated with improved outcomes.
Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):40-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0515.
3
Review of the acuity scoring systems for the pediatric intensive care unit and their use in quality improvement.
J Intensive Care Med. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):131-40. doi: 10.1177/0885066607299492.
4
Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants.
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2165-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa065029.
5
Pediatric and neonatal transport teams with and without a physician: a comparison of outcomes and interventions.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318030083d.
8
Severity of illness and organ dysfunction scoring in children.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3 Suppl):S126-34. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161287.61028.D4.
10
PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality.
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):278-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1601-2. Epub 2003 Jan 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验