Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center and Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation, and Immunity (N4i), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jun;56(6):3133-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05841-11. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
Acutely ill patients with candidemia frequently suffer from renal insufficiency. Voriconazole's intravenous formulation with sulfobutylether beta-cyclodextrin (SBECD) is restricted in patients with renal insufficiency. We evaluated the use of intravenous voriconazole formulated with SBECD in candidemic patients with renal insufficiency and compared treatment outcome and safety to those who received a short course of amphotericin B deoxycholate followed by fluconazole. We reviewed data on treatment outcome, survival, safety, and tolerability from the subset of patients with moderate (creatinine clearance [CrCl], 30 to 50 ml/min) or severe (CrCl, <30 ml/min) renal insufficiency enrolled in a trial of voriconazole compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate followed by fluconazole for treatment of candidemia in 370 patients. Fifty-eight patients with renal impairment were identified: 41 patients on voriconazole and 17 on amphotericin B/fluconazole. The median duration of treatment was 14 days for voriconazole (median, 7 days intravenous) and 11 days for amphotericin B/fluconazole, 3 days of which were for amphotericin B. Despite the short duration of exposure, worsening of renal function or newly emerged renal adverse events were reported in 53% of amphotericin B-treated patients compared to 39% of voriconazole-treated patients. During treatment, median serum creatinine decreased in the voriconazole arm, whereas creatinine increased in the amphotericin B/fluconazole arm, before return to baseline at week 3. All-cause mortality at 14 weeks was 49% in the voriconazole arm compared to 65% in the amphotericin B/fluconazole arm. Intravenous voriconazole formulated with SBECD was effective in patients with moderate or severe renal insufficiency and candidemia and was associated with less acute renal toxicity than amphotericin B/fluconazole.
患有念珠菌血症的重症患者常伴有肾功能不全。由于肾功能不全患者限制使用含有磺丁基醚-β-环糊精(SBECD)的伏立康唑静脉制剂,我们评估了含有 SBECD 的伏立康唑在伴有肾功能不全的念珠菌血症患者中的应用,并将其治疗结果和安全性与接受短程两性霉素 B 去氧胆酸盐加氟康唑治疗的患者进行比较。我们回顾了一项纳入 370 例念珠菌血症患者的临床试验中,中度(肌酐清除率 [CrCl],30 至 50ml/min)或重度(CrCl,<30ml/min)肾功能不全亚组患者的治疗结果、生存、安全性和耐受性数据,这些患者接受伏立康唑治疗与两性霉素 B 去氧胆酸盐加氟康唑治疗念珠菌血症的结果进行了比较。在肾功能不全患者中发现 58 例:41 例接受伏立康唑治疗,17 例接受两性霉素 B/氟康唑治疗。伏立康唑治疗的中位疗程为 14 天(中位静脉治疗 7 天),两性霉素 B/氟康唑治疗的中位疗程为 11 天,其中 3 天为两性霉素 B。尽管两性霉素 B 治疗组的暴露时间较短,但与伏立康唑治疗组(39%)相比,有 53%的患者肾功能恶化或出现新的肾脏不良事件。在治疗期间,伏立康唑组的血清肌酐中位数下降,而两性霉素 B/氟康唑组的肌酐增加,在第 3 周时恢复至基线。在 14 周时,伏立康唑组的全因死亡率为 49%,而两性霉素 B/氟康唑组为 65%。
在伴有中重度肾功能不全和念珠菌血症的患者中,含有 SBECD 的伏立康唑静脉制剂是有效的,与两性霉素 B/氟康唑相比,其急性肾毒性较低。