University of Padova, Italy.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jul;24(7):1519-31. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00231. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
Growing evidence indicates that planning eye movements and orienting visuospatial attention share overlapping brain mechanisms. A tight link between endogenous attention and eye movements is maintained by the premotor theory, in contrast to other accounts that postulate the existence of specific attention mechanisms that modulate the activity of information processing systems. The strong assumption of equivalence between attention and eye movements, however, is challenged by demonstrations that human observers are able to keep attention on a specific location while moving the eyes elsewhere. Here we investigate whether a recurrent model of saccadic planning can account for attentional effects without requiring additional or specific mechanisms separate from the circuits that perform sensorimotor transformations for eye movements. The model builds on the basis function approach and includes a circuit that performs spatial remapping using an "internal forward model" of how visual inputs are modified as a result of saccadic movements. Simulations show that the latter circuit is crucial to account for dissociations between attention and eye movements that may be invoked to disprove the premotor theory. The model provides new insights into how spatial remapping may be implemented in parietal cortex and offers a computational framework for recent proposals that link visual stability with remapping of attention pointers.
越来越多的证据表明,计划眼球运动和定位视空间注意力共享重叠的大脑机制。与其他假设存在特定的注意力机制来调节信息处理系统的活动的观点不同,前运动理论认为,内源性注意力和眼球运动之间存在紧密的联系。然而,注意力和眼球运动之间的等效性的强烈假设受到了挑战,因为有证据表明,人类观察者能够在眼睛移动到其他地方的同时,将注意力集中在特定的位置上。在这里,我们研究了一个扫视性计划的递归模型是否可以在不要求额外或专门的机制的情况下,从执行眼动感觉运动转换的电路中,来解释注意力效应。该模型基于基函数方法,并包括一个使用“内部前向模型”执行空间重映射的电路,该模型描述了视觉输入如何由于扫视运动而发生改变。模拟结果表明,后一个电路对于解释注意力和眼球运动之间的分离至关重要,这些分离可能被用来反驳前运动理论。该模型为顶叶皮层中空间重映射的实现提供了新的见解,并为最近提出的将视觉稳定性与注意力指针重映射联系起来的观点提供了计算框架。