Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone (Milan), Institute of Care and Research, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1558-66. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2287-y. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
Although there is growing evidence in favour of the bio-psychosocial approach to the treatment of persistent neck pain, it is questioned whether treating psychological factors can improve patient perceptions of disability, pain and quality of life. This randomised, controlled study with 12 months' follow-up was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of adding cognitive-behavioural principles to exercises for chronic neck pain.
Eighty patients were randomly assigned to the usual neck exercises plus cognitive-behavioural treatment (PTcb group, 40 subjects) or to treatment based on neck exercises alone (PT group, 40 subjects). Before treatment (T1), at the end of treatment (T2) and 12 months later (T3), all of the patients completed a booklet including the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, a numerical rating scale, and the Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36).
The present trial failed to demonstrate its primary end point: the pre- and post-treatment difference in total NPDS scores was not statistically different between groups. Disability improved similarly in both groups over time, remaining stable until T3 in the PTcb group and slightly increasing at the same time in the PT group. Pain trends were comparable, with both groups showing an improvement between T1 and T2, and a slight worsening between T2 and T3. There were significant increases in all of the SF-36 domains except for health in general, and vitality in both groups by the end of treatment. SF-36 showed a between-group difference only for the physical activity domain (10.4; 95% CI 2.4-18.5).
Disability, pain and quality of life improved at the end of treatment in both groups, without differences between them.
尽管越来越多的证据支持生物-心理-社会方法治疗持续性颈痛,但治疗心理因素是否能改善患者对残疾、疼痛和生活质量的感知仍存在疑问。本研究采用随机对照试验,随访 12 个月,旨在评估将认知行为原理加入慢性颈痛运动治疗中的疗效。
80 例患者被随机分为常规颈运动加认知行为治疗组(PTcb 组,40 例)或仅基于颈运动治疗组(PT 组,40 例)。在治疗前(T1)、治疗结束时(T2)和 12 个月后(T3),所有患者均完成包括颈痛和残疾量表、数字评分量表和健康调查简表(SF-36)在内的小册子。
本试验未能达到主要终点:治疗前后 NPDS 总分的差异在两组间无统计学意义。两组患者的残疾状况随时间推移均得到相似改善,PTcb 组在 T3 时保持稳定,PT 组在同一时间略有增加。疼痛趋势相似,两组均显示 T1 至 T2 时有所改善,T2 至 T3 时略有恶化。除一般健康和活力外,SF-36 的所有领域均显著增加,治疗结束时两组均如此。SF-36 仅在身体活动领域存在组间差异(10.4;95%CI 2.4-18.5)。
两组患者在治疗结束时残疾、疼痛和生活质量均得到改善,两组间无差异。