Suppr超能文献

髋关节神经源性异位骨化的分类方法。

A classification method for neurogenic heterotopic ossification of the hip.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, University of Bologna, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Jun;13(2):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0193-z. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing classifications for heterotopic ossification (HO) do not include all HO types; nor do they consider the anatomy of the involved joint or the neurological injury. Therefore, we performed this study to propose and evaluate a classification according to the location of neurogenic HO and the neurological injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the files of 24 patients/33 hips with brain or spinal cord injury and neurogenic HO of the hip treated with excision, indomethacin, and radiation therapy. We classified patients according to the Brooker classification scheme as well as ours. Four types of neurogenic HO were distinguished according to the anatomical location of HO: type 1, anterior; type 2, posterior; type 3, anteromedial; type 4, circumferential. Subtypes of each type were added based on the neurological injury: a, spinal cord; b, brain injury. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years (1-8 years).

RESULTS

The Brooker classification scheme was misleading-all hips were class III or IV, corresponding to ankylosis, even though only 14 hips had ankylosis. On the other hand, our classification was straightforward and easy to assign in all cases. It corresponded better to the location of the heterotopic bone, and allowed for preoperative planning of the appropriate surgical approach and evaluation of the prognosis; recurrence of neurogenic HO was significantly higher in patients with brain injury (subtype b), while blood loss was higher for patients with anteromedial (type 3) and circumferential (type 4) neurogenic HO.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed classification may improve the management and evaluation of the prognosis for patients with neurogenic HO.

摘要

背景

现有的异位骨化 (HO) 分类法并不包括所有 HO 类型;也不考虑受累关节的解剖结构或神经损伤。因此,我们进行了这项研究,提出并评估了一种根据神经源性 HO 的位置和神经损伤进行分类的方法。

材料和方法

我们研究了 24 例/33 髋脑或脊髓损伤后合并髋关节神经源性 HO 患者的病历,这些患者均接受了切除术、吲哚美辛和放射治疗。我们根据布鲁克 (Brooker) 分类方案和我们自己的方案对患者进行分类。根据 HO 的解剖位置,将神经源性 HO 分为 4 型:1 型,前侧;2 型,后侧;3 型,前内侧;4 型,环形。每种类型都根据神经损伤添加了亚型:a,脊髓损伤;b,脑损伤。平均随访 2.5 年(1-8 年)。

结果

布鲁克分类方案具有误导性-所有髋关节均为 III 或 IV 级,对应于强直,尽管只有 14 髋强直。另一方面,我们的分类简单明了,适用于所有病例。它与异位骨的位置更相符,允许术前规划合适的手术入路并评估预后;脑损伤患者(亚型 b)神经源性 HO 复发率明显更高,而前内侧(3 型)和环形(4 型)神经源性 HO 患者的出血量更高。

结论

我们提出的分类方法可能会改善神经源性 HO 患者的管理和预后评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63fa/4417773/49dfff24dce6/10195_2012_193_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验