Reese H W
Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;17(1):75-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03392654.
Teleological descriptions and explanations refer to purpose as consequent to a phenomenon. They become nonteleological if purpose is represented as antecedent to the phenomenon. Such nonteleological statements are called teleonomic, especially when they refer to antecedent genetic "programs." In behavior analysis, purpose is attributed to the organism's history of consequences. Such a history may leave a trace-physiological (mechanism) or mental (cognitivism)-or the issue of traces may be irrelevant (contextualism). The history or trace is antecedent to current responding, and thus is not a teleological concept in the classical sense. It could be called a teleonomic concept, but this designation is undesirable if it implies exclusively genetic programming, because the history or trace is genetically programmed in evolutionary selection but not in ontogenetic selection. Therefore, the concepts of teleology and teleonomy are not useful for behavior analysis, and invoking them can be misleading. The concept of purpose can be useful if it is not reified.
目的论描述和解释将目的视为现象的结果。如果将目的表示为现象的前提,它们就变成了非目的论的。这种非目的论陈述被称为目的性的,特别是当它们涉及先前的遗传“程序”时。在行为分析中,目的归因于有机体的后果历史。这样的历史可能会留下痕迹——生理的(机制)或心理的(认知主义)——或者痕迹问题可能无关紧要(情境主义)。历史或痕迹先于当前的反应,因此在经典意义上不是一个目的论概念。它可以被称为一个目的性概念,但如果它仅仅意味着遗传编程,这个名称是不合适的,因为历史或痕迹是在进化选择中通过遗传编程的,而不是在个体发育选择中。因此,目的论和目的性概念对行为分析没有用处,援引它们可能会产生误导。如果不将目的概念具体化,它可能会有用。