Department of Emergency Medicine at Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA 01199, USA.
Resuscitation. 2012 Nov;83(11):1358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.03.033. Epub 2012 Apr 7.
Survival data for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims initially in PEA or asystole who convert to a shockable rhythm during attempted resuscitation, relative to an initial shockable rhythm, have never been previously reported. This study was done to assess OHCA outcomes among a large cohort of adults in the CARES dataset stratified by three rhythm categories: initial shockable (IS), converted shockable (CS), and never shockable (NS).
The study was IRB approved. All adult index events at participating sites (2005-2010) were study eligible. All patient data elements were provided. Odds ratios of CS and NS status for survival to hospital discharge were calculated via multivariate logistic regression that adjusted for demographics, site, resuscitation initiators, AED use, and other covariates.
There were 40,274 OHCA records submitted to the CARES registry during the study period. After exclusions, our final sample size was 30,939 (7404 IS [23.9%], 3225 CS [10.4%], 20,310 NS [65.7%]). Raw survival rates of CS and NS patients were similar (4.7% vs. 4.1%, respectively; p=0.08) but significantly lower than IS patients (26.9%; p<0.001). The adjusted OR of survival to hospital discharge for CS was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.20) and for NS it was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.18) with IS as the referent.
After OHCA, the survival rate for CS victims is significantly lower than for IS patients. These findings suggest that CS and IS are different entities and that alternatives to existing resuscitation algorithm tailored to patients with CS should be investigated.
在尝试复苏过程中从 PEA 或心搏骤停初始状态转变为可除颤节律的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存数据,与初始可除颤节律相比,此前从未有过报道。本研究旨在评估 CARES 数据集内一个大的成年 OHCA 患者队列的结局,这些患者按三种节律分类:初始可除颤(IS)、转变为可除颤(CS)和从未可除颤(NS)。
本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。参与研究的所有机构的所有成年初始事件(2005-2010 年)都符合研究标准。提供了所有患者的数据元素。通过多变量逻辑回归计算 CS 和 NS 状态的存活至出院的优势比,该回归调整了人口统计学、地点、复苏启动者、AED 使用和其他协变量。
在研究期间,CARES 登记处提交了 40274 份 OHCA 记录。排除后,我们的最终样本量为 30939 例(7404 例 IS [23.9%]、3225 例 CS [10.4%]、20310 例 NS [65.7%])。CS 和 NS 患者的原始生存率相似(分别为 4.7%和 4.1%,p=0.08),但明显低于 IS 患者(26.9%,p<0.001)。CS 患者存活至出院的调整后的优势比为 0.17(95%CI:0.14,0.20),NS 患者为 0.17(95%CI:0.15,0.18),IS 为参照。
OHCA 后,CS 患者的存活率明显低于 IS 患者。这些发现表明 CS 和 IS 是不同的实体,应该研究针对 CS 患者的替代现有复苏算法。