Suppr超能文献

屈肌腱移植中阶梯状吻合与普尔弗塔夫吻合的比较:体外犬模型的生物力学评估

Comparison of step-cut and Pulvertaft attachment for flexor tendon graft: a biomechanics evaluation in an in vitro canine model.

作者信息

Hashimoto T, Thoreson A R, An K-N, Amadio P C, Zhao C

机构信息

Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Nov;37(9):848-54. doi: 10.1177/1753193412442460. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods of joining tendons of similar and dissimilar sizes between recipient and donor tendons for flexor tendon grafts. Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and peroneus longus (PL) canine tendons were harvested and divided into four groups. The repair technique we compared was a step-cut (SC) suture and a Pulvertaft weave (PW). FDP tendons were significantly larger in diameter than PL tendons (p < 0.05). The volume of the SC repairs using either FDP or PL tendon as a graft was significantly smaller than PW repairs (p < 0.05). The ultimate load to failure and repair stiffness in FDP graft tendons significantly increased compared with the PL graft tendons (p < 0.05). The SC suture can be used as an alternative to the PW, with similar strength and less bulk for repairs using graft tendons of similar diameter. Surgeons should be aware of the effect of graft tendon size and repair method on strength and bulk when performing flexor tendon grafts.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种不同的方法,用于在屈肌腱移植中连接受区和供区大小相似及不同的肌腱。采集犬的指深屈肌(FDP)和腓骨长肌(PL)肌腱,并将其分为四组。我们比较的修复技术是阶梯状切割(SC)缝合和普尔弗塔夫编织(PW)。FDP肌腱的直径明显大于PL肌腱(p < 0.05)。使用FDP或PL肌腱作为移植物的SC修复的体积明显小于PW修复(p < 0.05)。与PL移植肌腱相比,FDP移植肌腱的极限破坏载荷和修复刚度显著增加(p < 0.05)。对于直径相似的移植肌腱修复,SC缝合可作为PW的替代方法,具有相似的强度且体积更小。在进行屈肌腱移植时,外科医生应注意移植肌腱大小和修复方法对强度和体积的影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of step-cut and Pulvertaft attachment for flexor tendon graft: a biomechanics evaluation in an in vitro canine model.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Nov;37(9):848-54. doi: 10.1177/1753193412442460. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
2
Mechanical strength of the side-to-side versus Pulvertaft weave tendon repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Apr;35(4):540-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
3
Biomechanical study comparing Pulvertaft suture to step-cut suture.
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2018 Feb;37(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
In Vitro Comparison between the Pulvertaft Weave and the Modified Core Suture Pulvertaft Weave.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021 Sep;26(3):377-382. doi: 10.1142/S2424835521500351.
5
Biomechanical comparison of lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side tendon repairs.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):567-571. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addb8f.
6
Biomechanical Study Comparing Pulvertaft, Double Side-to-Side, and Locking Side-to-Side Tendon Suture Techniques.
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Mar;46(3):246.e1-246.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
7
Biomechanical and Dimensional Measurements of the Pulvertaft Weave Versus the Cow-Hitch Technique.
Hand (N Y). 2017 Jan;12(1):78-84. doi: 10.1177/1558944716646758. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
8
Comparison of Flexor Tendon Repair Between 6-Strand Lim-Tsai With 4-Strand Cruciate and Becker Technique.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Sep;40(9):1806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
The strengths of one-, two-, and three-weave Pulvertaft tendon repairs.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Dec;45(10):1051-1054. doi: 10.1177/1753193420926097. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
The use of barbed sutures in the Pulvertaft weave: a biomechanical study.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Dec;45(10):1055-1060. doi: 10.1177/1753193420909452. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
New dynamic suture material for tendon transfer surgeries in the upper extremity - a biomechanical comparative analysis.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jun;144(6):2905-2914. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05322-5. Epub 2024 May 2.
2
3
The effect of increasing the contact surface on tendon healing.
Arch Plast Surg. 2018 Jul;45(4):357-362. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.01284. Epub 2018 Jul 15.
4
Biomechanical and Dimensional Measurements of the Pulvertaft Weave Versus the Cow-Hitch Technique.
Hand (N Y). 2017 Jan;12(1):78-84. doi: 10.1177/1558944716646758. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon graft with different repair techniques and graft surface modification.
J Orthop Res. 2015 May;33(5):731-7. doi: 10.1002/jor.22844. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Flexor tendon reconstruction.
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jun;35(6):1025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.042.
3
Mechanical strength of the side-to-side versus Pulvertaft weave tendon repair.
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Apr;35(4):540-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
4
Biomechanical comparison of lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side tendon repairs.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):567-571. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addb8f.
5
Comparison of loop-tendon versus end-weave methods for tendon transfer or grafting in rabbits.
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(6):1074-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.025.
7
In vitro biomechanical study to compare the double-loop technique with the Pulvertaft weave for tendon anastomosis.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2008;42(6):305-7. doi: 10.1080/02844310802401330.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验