Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1232-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
The mechanisms supporting temporal processing of pain remain poorly understood. To determine the involvement of opioid mechanisms in temporal processing of pain, responses to dynamic noxious thermal stimuli and offset analgesia were assessed after administration of naloxone, a μ-opioid antagonist, and on a separate day, during and after intravenous administration of remifentanil, a μ-opioid agonist, in 19 healthy human volunteers. Multiple end points were sampled from real-time computerized visual analog scale ratings (VAS, 1 to 10) to assess thermal sensitivity, magnitude and duration of offset analgesia, and painful after sensations. It was hypothesized that the magnitude of offset analgesia would be reduced by direct opioid antagonism and during states of acute opioid-induced hypersensitivity (OIH), as well as diminished by the presence of exogenous opioids. Surprisingly, the magnitude of offset analgesia was not altered after naloxone administration, during remifentanil infusion, or after the termination of remifentanil infusion. Because thermal hyperalgesia was observed after both drugs, 8 of the original 19 subjects returned for an additional session without drug administration. Thermal hyperalgesia and increased magnitude of offset analgesia were observed across conditions of remifentanil, naloxone, and no drug within this subset analysis, indicating that repeated heat testing induced thermal hyperalgesia, which potentiated the magnitude of offset analgesia. Thus, it is concluded that the mechanisms subserving temporal processing of nociceptive information are largely opioid-independent, but that offset analgesia may be potentiated by heat-induced thermal hyperalgesia in a proportion of individuals.
疼痛时间处理的机制仍知之甚少。为了确定阿片类药物机制在疼痛时间处理中的作用,在 19 名健康志愿者中,分别给予纳洛酮(μ 阿片受体拮抗剂)和瑞芬太尼(μ 阿片受体激动剂)静脉输注期间和输注后,评估了对动态伤害性热刺激和消退镇痛的反应。从实时计算机化视觉模拟量表评分(VAS,1 到 10)中采样多个终点,以评估热敏感性、消退镇痛的幅度和持续时间以及疼痛后感觉。假设直接阿片受体拮抗作用和急性阿片诱导的超敏反应(OIH)状态下,消退镇痛的幅度会降低,并且外源性阿片类药物的存在也会降低消退镇痛的幅度。令人惊讶的是,纳洛酮给药后、瑞芬太尼输注期间或瑞芬太尼输注终止后,消退镇痛的幅度并未改变。由于两种药物后均观察到热痛觉过敏,因此原始 19 名受试者中的 8 名返回进行无药物给药的额外测试。在瑞芬太尼、纳洛酮和无药物这一亚组分析的所有条件下,均观察到热痛觉过敏和消退镇痛幅度增加,表明重复热测试引起热痛觉过敏,增强了消退镇痛的幅度。因此,可以得出结论,伤害性信息时间处理的机制在很大程度上不依赖于阿片类药物,但在一部分个体中,消退镇痛可能会被热诱导的热痛觉过敏增强。