Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂在日本老年、高危、高血压患者中的应用。

Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in Japanese elderly, high-risk, hypertensive patients.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2012 Oct;125(10):981-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy or angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker combination therapy is better in elderly hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of these treatments in elderly, high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients.

METHODS

The OlmeSartan and Calcium Antagonists Randomized (OSCAR) study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point study of 1164 hypertensive patients aged 65 to 84 years with type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension during treatment with olmesartan 20 mg/d were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d olmesartan (high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker) or a calcium channel blocker + 20 mg/d olmesartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker). The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular death.

RESULTS

During a 3-year follow-up, blood pressure was significantly lower in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group than in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group. Mean blood pressure at 36 months was 135.0/74.3 mm Hg in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group and 132.6/72.6 mm Hg in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group. More primary end points occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group than in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group (58 vs 48 events, hazard ratio [HR], 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.92; P=.17). In patients with cardiovascular disease at baseline, more primary events occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group (HR, 1.63, P=.03); in contrast, fewer events were observed in the subgroup without cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.52, P=.14). This treatment-by-subgroup interaction was significant (P=.02).

CONCLUSION

The angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker combination lowered blood pressure more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker and reduced the incidence of primary end points more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker in patients with cardiovascular disease. The addition of a second antihypertensive agent is more effective at lowering blood pressure than simply doubling the dose of an existing agent.

摘要

背景

在心血管风险较高的老年高血压患者中,高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂治疗或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂+钙通道阻滞剂联合治疗哪种更好,目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较这些治疗方法在日本老年高危高血压患者中的疗效。

方法

OlmeSartan 和钙拮抗剂随机(OSCAR)研究是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点研究,共纳入 1164 例年龄 65 至 84 岁、患有 2 型糖尿病或心血管疾病的高血压患者。这些患者在接受奥美沙坦 20mg/d 治疗期间血压控制不佳,被随机分配接受奥美沙坦 40mg/d(高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂)或钙通道阻滞剂+奥美沙坦 20mg/d(血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂+钙通道阻滞剂)。主要终点是心血管事件和非心血管死亡的复合终点。

结果

在 3 年的随访期间,血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂+钙通道阻滞剂组的血压明显低于高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂组。高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂组 36 个月时的平均血压为 135.0/74.3mmHg,血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂+钙通道阻滞剂组为 132.6/72.6mmHg。高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂组的主要终点事件发生率高于血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂+钙通道阻滞剂组(58 例 vs 48 例,风险比[HR]为 1.31,95%置信区间为 0.89-1.92;P=.17)。在基线时有心血管疾病的患者中,高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂组的主要事件更多(HR,1.63,P=.03);相比之下,在没有心血管疾病的亚组中观察到的事件更少(HR,0.52,P=.14)。这种治疗与亚组之间的相互作用具有统计学意义(P=.02)。

结论

血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂+钙通道阻滞剂联合治疗比高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂更能降低血压,并且在患有心血管疾病的患者中,与高剂量血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂相比,主要终点事件的发生率更低。与简单地将现有药物剂量加倍相比,添加第二种降压药物更能有效降低血压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验