Suppr超能文献

参加临床试验比不参加要好:从临床神经病学中吸取的教训——急性多发性硬化症复发的治疗。

It is better to be in a clinical trial than not: lessons learnt from clinical neurology--the management of acute multiple sclerosis relapses.

机构信息

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

出版信息

QJM. 2012 Aug;105(8):775-80. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcs070. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare being on-, or off-, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for the same intervention.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Ambulatory outpatient clinic in a clinical neurosciences centre.

SUBJECTS

Patients experiencing a clinically significant multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse, who received a 3-day regimen of intravenous methylprednisolone as an ambulatory outpatient, were compared with a similar group of patients who had previously been treated exactly in the same way while participating in a RCT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Management Scale (MSRMS) was used to measure patients' experiences of relapse management in both groups. The two groups were compared under four main headings: interpersonal care, access to care, information and coordination of care.

RESULTS

The principal finding was that interpersonal care was significantly worse in the off-trial group (P = 0.0001), implying a beneficial trial effect on patient experience.

CONCLUSION

The effect observed is likely secondary to trial participation; both groups had similar baseline features, and were treated in the same way. Likely mechanisms for the differences are protocol, care and Hawthorne effects. The findings support the incorporation of structured RCT-style practice into routine clinical management, in order to deliver a more patient-centred care in the treatment of MS relapses. This may have implications for other chronic neurological diseases.

摘要

目的

比较同一干预措施的临床试验(RCT)中入组与未入组的情况。

设计

队列研究。

地点

临床神经科学中心的门诊。

对象

经历临床显著多发性硬化(MS)复发的患者,他们接受了为期 3 天的静脉注射甲基强的松龙治疗,作为门诊患者,与一组以前接受过相同治疗的类似患者进行比较,这些患者曾参与 RCT 研究。

主要观察指标

采用多发性硬化复发管理量表(MSRMS)评估两组患者的复发管理体验。在四个主要标题下比较两组:人际护理、获得护理、信息和护理协调。

结果

主要发现是未参加试验组的人际护理明显较差(P=0.0001),这意味着试验对患者体验有有益的影响。

结论

观察到的效果可能是由于试验参与所致;两组具有相似的基线特征,并且以相同的方式进行治疗。可能导致差异的机制是方案、护理和霍桑效应。研究结果支持将结构化 RCT 式实践纳入常规临床管理,以提供更以患者为中心的 MS 复发治疗方法。这可能对其他慢性神经疾病有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验