School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
J Chem Phys. 2012 Apr 21;136(15):154105. doi: 10.1063/1.3702848.
Moment-closure approximations have in recent years become a popular means to estimate the mean concentrations and the variances and covariances of the concentration fluctuations of species involved in stochastic chemical reactions, such as those inside cells. The typical assumption behind these methods is that all cumulants of the probability distribution function solution of the chemical master equation which are higher than a certain order are negligibly small and hence can be set to zero. These approximations are ad hoc and hence the reliability of the predictions of these class of methods is presently unclear. In this article, we study the accuracy of the two moment approximation (2MA) (third and higher order cumulants are zero) and of the three moment approximation (3MA) (fourth and higher order cumulants are zero) for chemical systems which are monostable and composed of unimolecular and bimolecular reactions. We use the system-size expansion, a systematic method of solving the chemical master equation for monostable reaction systems, to calculate in the limit of large reaction volumes, the first- and second-order corrections to the mean concentration prediction of the rate equations and the first-order correction to the variance and covariance predictions of the linear-noise approximation. We also compute these corrections using the 2MA and the 3MA. Comparison of the latter results with those of the system-size expansion shows that: (i) the 2MA accurately captures the first-order correction to the rate equations but its first-order correction to the linear-noise approximation exhibits the wrong dependence on the rate constants. (ii) the 3MA accurately captures the first- and second-order corrections to the rate equation predictions and the first-order correction to the linear-noise approximation. Hence while both the 2MA and the 3MA are more accurate than the rate equations, only the 3MA is more accurate than the linear-noise approximation across all of parameter space. The analytical results are numerically validated for dimerization and enzyme-catalyzed reactions.
近年来,矩封闭近似法已成为一种估算参与随机化学反应(如细胞内的化学反应)的物种浓度均值及其波动和协方差的流行方法。这些方法背后的典型假设是,化学主方程概率分布函数解的所有阶数高于特定阶数的累积量都可以忽略不计,因此可以设为零。这些近似方法是特定的,因此这些方法的预测的可靠性目前还不清楚。在本文中,我们研究了单稳定的单分子和双分子反应化学系统的二矩近似(2MA)(三阶及更高阶累积量为零)和三矩近似(3MA)(四阶及更高阶累积量为零)的准确性。我们使用系统尺寸展开法,一种系统的求解单稳定反应系统的化学主方程的方法,在大反应体积极限下计算了对速率方程的浓度均值预测的一阶和二阶修正以及对线性噪声近似的方差和协方差预测的一阶修正。我们还使用 2MA 和 3MA 计算了这些修正值。将后者的结果与系统尺寸展开法的结果进行比较表明:(i)2MA 准确地捕获了速率方程的一阶修正,但它对线性噪声近似的一阶修正表现出与速率常数的错误依赖关系。(ii)3MA 准确地捕获了速率方程预测的一阶和二阶修正以及线性噪声近似的一阶修正。因此,虽然 2MA 和 3MA 都比速率方程更准确,但只有 3MA 在整个参数空间内比线性噪声近似更准确。对二聚化和酶催化反应进行了数值验证。