Orland Barbara
Program Sciences Studies, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 21, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Jun;43(2):357-69. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.028. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
This paper investigates the theory of nutrition of Herman Boerhaave, the famous professor of medicine and chemistry at the university of Leyden. Boerhaave's work, which systematized and synthesized the knowledge of the time, represents a shift from a humoral to a hydraulic model of the body in medicine and culture around 1700. This epistemological reconfiguration of early modern physiological thinking is exemplified with respect to the changing meanings of milk. While over centuries the analogy between blood and milk played an essential role in understanding the hidden workings of the nutritional faculties, following the discovery of the blood circulation the blood-milk analogy was transformed into a chyle-milk analogy. Yet Boerhaave's interpretations show that the use of new knowledge tools did not simply displace the old ways of reasoning. Instead, analogies continued to serve as epistemic instruments. Old theories and new insights overlapped, and contemporary knowledge assimilated past ideas.
本文研究了莱顿大学著名医学与化学教授赫尔曼·布尔哈夫的营养理论。布尔哈夫的著作对当时的知识进行了系统化和综合,代表了1700年左右医学和文化领域中人体模型从体液模型向液压模型的转变。早期现代生理学思维的这种认识论重构在牛奶含义的变化中得到了体现。几个世纪以来,血液与牛奶之间的类比在理解营养功能的隐藏作用方面发挥了重要作用,但随着血液循环的发现,血乳类比转变为乳糜 - 牛奶类比。然而,布尔哈夫的解释表明,新知识工具的使用并没有简单地取代旧的推理方式。相反,类比继续作为认知工具发挥作用。旧理论与新见解相互重叠,当代知识吸收了过去的观念。