Division of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012 Apr;24(2):135-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00433.x. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Cracked teeth may traditionally require the use of complete coverage crowns. Alternative conservative treatments involve the use of adhesive inlays/onlays with the possibility of including a fiber patch to reinforce the cracked cusp.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fatigue strength of compromised molars restored with computer-aided-design/computer-assisted-manufactured (CAD/CAM) composite resin inlays/onlays with and without fiber-reinforced immediate dentin sealing (IDS).
Large mesio-occluso-distal preparations with cracked/undermined palatal cusps were simulated on 40 extracted maxillary molars. All teeth received IDS (Optibond FL, Kerr, Orange, CA, USA), and composite resin (Paradigm MZ100, 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) inlays (N = 20) and onlays (N = 20). A fiber patch (Ribbond, Ribbond Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) was applied in half of the preparations. Restorations were adhesively luted with pre-heated composite resin (Z100, 3-M ESPE) and submitted to cyclic isometric loading at 5 Hz, starting with a load of 50 N (5,000 cycles), followed by stages of 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, 900, and 1,050 N at a maximum of 25,000 cycles each. Specimens were loaded until fracture or to a maximum of 180,000 cycles. Groups were compared using the life table survival analysis.
Differences in survival probability were found (p = 0.04). The inlay group with fiber patch failed at an average load of 870 N, and none of the specimens withstood all 180,000 load cycles; survival rates of inlays and onlays without fibers, and onlays with fibers were 10, 30, and 50%, respectively.
Onlays (with or without fibers) increased the fatigue resistance of compromised molars in this in vitro study.
传统上,牙裂可能需要使用全冠覆盖。替代的保守治疗方法包括使用粘结嵌体/贴面,并有可能使用纤维补丁来加强裂尖。
本研究的目的是评估用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)复合树脂嵌体/贴面修复有裂纹/受损腭尖的受损磨牙的疲劳强度,同时使用和不使用纤维增强即刻牙本质封闭(IDS)。
在 40 颗上颌磨牙上模拟了具有裂/底侧腭尖的大近中-颊-远中制备体。所有牙齿均接受 IDS(Optibond FL, Kerr,Orange,CA,USA)和复合树脂(Paradigm MZ100,3M-ESPE,St. Paul,MN,USA)嵌体(N = 20)和贴面(N = 20)。一半的制备体中应用了纤维补丁(Ribbond,Ribbond Inc.,Seattle,WA,USA)。修复体用预热的复合树脂(Z100,3M ESPE)粘结并进行等距循环加载,起始负荷为 50 N(5000 次循环),随后分别为 150、300、450、600、750、900 和 1050 N,每个阶段最大循环 25000 次。将标本加载至断裂或最大循环 180000 次。使用寿命表生存分析比较各组。
发现生存率存在差异(p = 0.04)。带有纤维补丁的嵌体组在平均 870 N 的负荷下失效,没有一个标本能承受所有 180000 次负荷循环;无纤维的嵌体和贴面、有纤维的贴面的存活率分别为 10%、30%和 50%。
在这项体外研究中,嵌体(带或不带纤维)增加了受损磨牙的抗疲劳性。