Oladapo Abiola O, Rascati Karen L
Division of Pharmacy Administration, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2012 Aug;25(4):457-70. doi: 10.1177/0897190012442715.
To provide a summary of published survey articles regarding the provision of medication therapy management (MTM) services in the United States.
A literature search was conducted to identify original articles on MTM-related surveys conducted in the United States, involving community and outpatient pharmacists, physicians, patients, or pharmacy students and published by the primary researchers who conducted the study. Search engines used included PubMed, Medline, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA). If MTM was in the keyword list, mesh heading, title, or abstract, the article was reviewed. References from these articles were searched to determine whether other relevant articles were available.
A total of 405 articles were initially reviewed; however, only 32 articles met the study requirements. Of the 32 articles, 17 surveyed community/outpatient pharmacists, 3 surveyed pharmacy students, 4 surveyed physicians, and 8 surveyed patients. The survey periods varied across the different studies, with the earliest survey conducted in 2004 and the most recent survey conducted in 2009. The surveys were conducted via the telephone, US mail, interoffice mail, e-mails, Internet/Web sites, hand-delivered questionnaires, and focus groups.
Despite the identified barriers to the provision of MTM services, pharmacists reportedly found it professionally rewarding to provide these services. Pharmacists claimed to have adequate clinical knowledge, experience, and access to information required to provide MTM services. Pharmacy students were of the opinion that the provision of MTM services was important to the advancement of the pharmacy profession and in providing patients with a higher level of care. Physicians supported having pharmacists adjust patients’ drug therapy and educate patients on general drug information but not in selecting patients’ drug therapy. Finally, patients suggested that alternative ways need to be explored in describing and marketing MTM services for it to be appealing to them.
总结已发表的关于美国药物治疗管理(MTM)服务提供情况的调查文章。
进行文献检索,以识别在美国开展的与MTM相关调查的原始文章,这些调查涉及社区和门诊药师、医生、患者或药学专业学生,且由开展该研究的主要研究人员发表。使用的搜索引擎包括PubMed、Medline和国际药学文摘(IPA)。若文章的关键词列表、主题词、标题或摘要中包含MTM,则对该文章进行审查。对这些文章的参考文献进行检索,以确定是否有其他相关文章。
最初共审查了405篇文章;然而,只有32篇文章符合研究要求。在这32篇文章中,17篇调查了社区/门诊药师,3篇调查了药学专业学生,4篇调查了医生,8篇调查了患者。不同研究的调查时间各不相同,最早的调查于2004年进行,最近的调查于2009年进行。调查通过电话、美国邮政、内部邮件、电子邮件、互联网/网站、亲手递交问卷和焦点小组等方式进行。
尽管已发现提供MTM服务存在障碍,但据报道,药师认为提供这些服务在职业上是有意义的。药师声称拥有提供MTM服务所需的足够临床知识、经验和信息获取途径。药学专业学生认为提供MTM服务对药学专业的发展以及为患者提供更高水平的护理很重要。医生支持药师调整患者的药物治疗并就一般药物信息对患者进行教育,但不支持药师选择患者的药物治疗。最后,患者建议需要探索其他方式来描述和推广MTM服务,使其对他们有吸引力。