Auerswald Günter, Šalek Silva Zupančić, Benson Gary, Elezović Ivo, Lambert Thierry, Morfini Massimo, Pasi John, Remor Eduardo, Santagostino Elena, Salaj Peter, Ljung Rolf
Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Professor Hess Children's Hospital, Bremen, Germany.
Hematology. 2012 Jan;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.1179/102453312X13221316477372.
Historically in hemophilia, outcome measures have not been collected systematically. Hence, there are insufficient clearly defined, evidence-based measures that can be applied consistently across hemophilia trials. This review focuses on some key challenges to evaluating patient outcomes and performing trials identified by experts at the Fourth and Fifth Zurich Haemophilia Forums. As procedures appear inconsistent across Europe, guidelines require modification to be more appropriate and/or realistically achievable. The outcome measures utilized, and the timing of their collection, should also be standardized, and more objective measures used where feasible. Implementation of outcome measures could be refined through greater understanding of patient heterogeneity, and tailored to differentiate between hemophilia- and aging-related disease effects. Furthermore, robust outcome measures that can also inform health-economic decisions are increasingly needed. Lastly, as patient recruitment poses a challenge, the panel proposed a call for action to motivate physicians and patients to participate in clinical trials.
从历史上看,在血友病领域,结局指标一直没有得到系统收集。因此,缺乏足够明确的、基于证据的指标可在血友病试验中始终如一地应用。本综述聚焦于评估患者结局及开展试验方面的一些关键挑战,这些挑战是由第四届和第五届苏黎世血友病论坛的专家们确定的。由于欧洲各地的程序似乎不一致,指南需要修改,以使其更合适和/或切实可行。所使用的结局指标及其收集时间也应标准化,在可行的情况下使用更客观的指标。通过更深入了解患者异质性,可以优化结局指标的实施,并进行调整以区分血友病相关和衰老相关的疾病影响。此外,越来越需要能够为卫生经济决策提供信息的有力结局指标。最后,由于患者招募存在挑战,专家小组提出了一项行动呼吁,以激励医生和患者参与临床试验。