Suppr超能文献

使用关节置换登记系统评估全髋关节置换假体。

Evaluation of total hip arthroplasty devices using a total joint replacement registry.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA 92109, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2:53-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3228.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to describe the infrastructure of the total joint replacement registry of a large integrated healthcare system's and emphasize challenges associated with orthopedic device classification and evaluation.

METHODS

Using a large integrated healthcare system innovative infrastructure including electronic health record data, administrative data sources, and registry data collection, we evaluated device choice and outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Devices were classified into type of bearing surface (alternative versus traditional). Multiple imputation was used to accommodate missing data, and a logistic regression model was applied to assess the impact of patient and surgeon factors on choice of bearing surface. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate risk of aseptic revision while controlling for surgeon, site, and patient characteristics. Adjusted cumulative probability-of-event curves were created, comparing survival of alternative against traditional bearings of devices, with aseptic revision as the outcome of interest.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 25,377 primary THAs with an average follow-up of 2.7 years. Choice of bearing surface varied by surgeon and patient characteristics. After adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital covariates, results showed that the risk of aseptic revision associated with alternative bearings did not differ significantly from traditional bearing surfaces (hazard ratio = 1.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically rich data from a registry with linkages to electronic health records and other administrative databases improve identification of exposures, outcomes, and patient subgroups in medical device evaluation. These various data sources facilitate refined adjustment for potential confounders such as hospital, surgeon, and patient factors and ensure comprehensive device performance evaluation within registries.

摘要

目的

本文旨在描述大型综合医疗保健系统中全关节置换登记处的基础设施,并强调与骨科器械分类和评估相关的挑战。

方法

利用大型综合医疗保健系统的创新基础设施,包括电子健康记录数据、行政数据源和登记处数据收集,我们评估了全髋关节置换术(THA)的器械选择和结果。器械被分为关节面类型(替代型与传统型)。采用多重插补法处理缺失数据,并应用逻辑回归模型评估患者和外科医生因素对关节面选择的影响。采用 Cox 回归模型,在控制外科医生、手术部位和患者特征的情况下,评估无菌性翻修的风险。创建调整后的累积事件概率曲线,比较替代型和传统型器械的关节面的生存情况,以无菌性翻修为关注结局。

结果

研究样本包括 25377 例初次 THA,平均随访 2.7 年。关节面选择因外科医生和患者特征而异。在调整患者、外科医生和医院协变量后,结果表明,与传统关节面相比,替代关节面的无菌性翻修风险无显著差异(风险比=1.33;95%置信区间:0.90,1.98)。

结论

来自与电子健康记录和其他行政数据库相链接的登记处的临床丰富数据,可提高医疗器械评价中暴露、结局和患者亚组的识别能力。这些不同的数据来源有助于更精细地调整医院、外科医生和患者等潜在混杂因素,并确保在登记处中全面评估器械性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验