Mengistu G, Akuffo H O, Yemane-Berhan T, Britton S, Fehniger T E
Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Parasite Immunol. 1990 Sep;12(5):495-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1990.tb00984.x.
In order to characterize the antigenic determinants of Leishmania aethiopica, we have analysed by immunoblotting the antibody reactivity of leishmaniasis patients with either the localized (LCL) or diffuse (DCL) clinical forms of disease. In this study we have compared the reactivity of antibodies from eight LCL and DCL patients to parasites isolated from each individual, or the parasite isolates of the other LCL and DCL patients studied. The immunoblot profiles of antibodies from LCL patients differed from the antibody profiles of DCL patients. Serum antibodies from LCL patients showed limited recognition of somatic antigens of less than Mr 50,000 which were recognized by antibodies present in DCL patients. A direct comparison of individual LCL and DCL patient derived promastigotes determined that the lack of antibody to these antigens in LCL patients was not due to the differential expression of these determinants by the LCL and DCL derived promastigotes. The results of this study suggest that although either LCL or DCL derived promastigotes express a wide variety of antigenic moieties which are potentially reactive with antibodies, only a subset of antibodies against these specificities develop in any individual patient, during active infection.
为了鉴定埃塞俄比亚利什曼原虫的抗原决定簇,我们通过免疫印迹法分析了利什曼病患者针对局限性(LCL)或弥漫性(DCL)临床疾病形式的抗体反应性。在本研究中,我们比较了8例LCL和DCL患者的抗体与从每个个体分离出的寄生虫或其他所研究的LCL和DCL患者的寄生虫分离株的反应性。LCL患者抗体的免疫印迹图谱与DCL患者的抗体图谱不同。LCL患者的血清抗体对分子量小于50,000的体细胞抗原的识别有限,而这些抗原能被DCL患者的抗体识别。对来自个体LCL和DCL患者的前鞭毛体进行直接比较,结果表明LCL患者缺乏针对这些抗原的抗体并非由于LCL和DCL来源的前鞭毛体对这些决定簇的差异表达所致。本研究结果表明,尽管LCL或DCL来源的前鞭毛体均表达多种可能与抗体发生反应的抗原部分,但在任何个体患者的活跃感染期间,仅产生针对这些特异性的一部分抗体。