Suppr超能文献

电子健康记录需要考虑伦理问题。

Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records.

机构信息

Health Ethics & Policy, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep;38(9):535-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100413. Epub 2012 May 9.

Abstract

National electronic health record initiatives are in progress in many countries around the world but the debate about the ethical issues and how they are to be addressed remains overshadowed by other issues. The discourse to which all others are answerable is a technical discourse, even where matters of privacy and consent are concerned. Yet a focus on technical issues and a failure to think about ethics are cited as factors in the failure of the UK health record system. In this paper, while the prime concern is the Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR), the discussion is relevant to and informed by the international context. The authors draw attention to ethical and conceptual issues that have implications for the success or failure of electronic health records systems. Important ethical issues to consider as Australia moves towards a PCEHR system include: issues of equity that arise in the context of personal control, who benefits and who should pay, what are the legitimate uses of PCEHRs, and how we should implement privacy. The authors identify specific questions that need addressing.

摘要

许多国家都在开展国家电子健康记录计划,但有关伦理问题及其解决方法的争论仍然被其他问题所掩盖。即使涉及隐私和同意等问题,所有其他问题都要回答的也是技术话语。然而,人们认为关注技术问题而不考虑道德问题是英国健康记录系统失败的原因之一。在本文中,虽然主要关注的是澳大利亚个人控制电子健康记录(PCEHR),但讨论也与国际背景相关,并借鉴了国际背景。作者提请注意对电子健康记录系统的成败有影响的伦理和概念问题。澳大利亚迈向 PCEHR 系统时需要考虑的重要伦理问题包括:个人控制方面出现的公平问题、谁受益和谁应该支付、PCEHR 的合法用途以及我们应如何实施隐私保护。作者确定了需要解决的具体问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验