Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.03.072. Epub 2012 May 9.
Advances in medical care had caused a paradigm shift in the indications for pericardiectomy. We evaluated the current predictors of in-hospital complications for pericardiectomy.
Patients who underwent pericardiectomy between 1998 and 2008 were identified from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Risk-adjusted logistic regression model was used to analyze the predictors of surgical outcomes.
A total of 13,593 patients underwent pericardiectomy during this period. Pericardiectomy was performed for constrictive pericarditis (28%; n = 3851), pericardial calcification (15%; n = 2061), secondary malignancies (3%; n = 456), adhesive pericarditis (2%; n = 318), and other causes (40%; n = 5461). Unadjusted mortality and complication rates were approximately 8% and 48%, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients required blood transfusion. Only 62% were routinely discharged home. After risk adjustment, age, female gender, comorbidity index, and the primary diagnosis independently predicted in-hospital mortality and overall complication rates (P < .05). Calcific pericarditis was the only etiology associated with lower risk-adjusted mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.48), operative complications (OR, 0.32), overall complications (OR, 0.32), incidence of transfusion (OR, 0.38), and highest routine discharge rates (OR, 1.84); P < .001 for all. Constrictive pericarditis had the highest requirement for cardiopulmonary bypass (OR, 6.41; P < .01) and incidence of bleeding complications (OR, 2.61; P < .01).
Morbidity remains high for pericardiectomy. In addition to age, gender, and comorbidities, attention should be given to etiology during surgical planning or referral. This significantly influences the requirement for cardiopulmonary bypass, chances of bleeding complications, and transfusion requirements.
医疗技术的进步导致了心包切除术适应证的范式转变。我们评估了心包切除术住院并发症的当前预测因素。
从美国全国住院患者样本中确定了 1998 年至 2008 年间接受心包切除术的患者。使用风险调整逻辑回归模型分析手术结果的预测因素。
在此期间,共有 13593 例患者接受了心包切除术。心包切除术的适应证为缩窄性心包炎(28%,n=3851)、心包钙化(15%,n=2061)、继发恶性肿瘤(3%,n=456)、粘连性心包炎(2%,n=318)和其他原因(40%,n=5461)。未经调整的死亡率和并发症发生率分别约为 8%和 48%。14%的患者需要输血。只有 62%的患者常规出院回家。风险调整后,年龄、女性、合并症指数和主要诊断独立预测住院死亡率和总并发症发生率(P<0.05)。钙化性心包炎是唯一与较低风险调整死亡率(比值比[OR],0.48)、手术并发症(OR,0.32)、总并发症(OR,0.32)、输血发生率(OR,0.38)和最高常规出院率(OR,1.84)相关的病因;所有 P<0.001。缩窄性心包炎对体外循环的需求最高(OR,6.41;P<0.01),出血并发症发生率最高(OR,2.61;P<0.01)。
心包切除术的发病率仍然很高。除了年龄、性别和合并症外,在手术计划或转诊时还应注意病因。这会显著影响体外循环的需求、出血并发症的机会和输血的需求。