Suppr超能文献

中低收入国家控烟的政治经济学分析。

Political economy analysis for tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Georgetown University, 3700 Reservoir Rd NW, St Mary's Hall #220, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2013 Mar;28(2):123-33. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs049. Epub 2012 May 13.

Abstract

Tobacco is already the world's leading cause of preventable death, claiming over 5 million lives annually, and this toll is rising. Even though effective tobacco control policies are well researched and widely disseminated, they remain largely unimplemented in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). For the most part, control attempts by advocates and government regulators have been frustrated by transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) and their supporters. One reason tobacco is so difficult to control is that its political economy has yet to be adequately understood and addressed. We conducted a review of the literature on tobacco control in LMICs using the databases PubMed, EconLit, PsychInfo and AGRICOLA. Among the over 2500 papers and reports we identified, very few explicitly applied political economy analysis to tobacco control in an LMIC setting. The vast majority of papers characterized important aspects of the tobacco epidemic, including who smokes, the effects of smoking on health, the effectiveness of advertising bans, and the activities of TTCs and their allies. But the political and economic dynamics of policy adoption and implementation were not discussed in any but a handful of papers. To help control advocates better understand and manage the process of policy implementation, we identify how political economy analysis would differ from the traditional public health approaches that dominate the literature. We focus on five important problem areas: information problems and the risks of smoking; the roles of domestic producers; multinational corporations and trade disputes in consumption; smuggling; the barriers to raising taxes and establishing spatial restrictions on smoking; and incentive conflicts between government branches. We conclude by discussing the political economy of tobacco and its implications for control strategies.

摘要

烟草已成为全球可预防死亡的首要原因,每年导致超过 500 万人死亡,且这一数字还在上升。尽管有效的烟草控制政策已经得到充分研究和广泛传播,但在大多数低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),这些政策仍在很大程度上未得到实施。在很大程度上,倡导者和政府监管机构的控制尝试受到跨国烟草公司(TTCs)及其支持者的阻挠。烟草难以控制的一个原因是,其政治经济学尚未得到充分理解和解决。我们使用 PubMed、EconLit、PsychInfo 和 AGRICOLA 数据库对 LMIC 中的烟草控制文献进行了综述。在我们确定的 2500 多篇论文和报告中,很少有明确将政治经济学分析应用于 LMIC 中的烟草控制。绝大多数论文描述了烟草流行的重要方面,包括谁吸烟、吸烟对健康的影响、广告禁令的有效性以及 TTCs 及其盟友的活动。但除了少数几篇论文外,没有讨论政策采纳和实施的政治和经济动态。为了帮助控制倡导者更好地理解和管理政策实施过程,我们确定政治经济学分析与主导文献的传统公共卫生方法有何不同。我们重点关注五个重要问题领域:信息问题和吸烟风险;国内生产商的作用;跨国公司和贸易争端对消费的影响;走私;提高税收和对吸烟进行空间限制的障碍;以及政府部门之间的激励冲突。最后,我们讨论了烟草的政治经济学及其对控制策略的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验