Suppr超能文献

解析纳米颗粒细胞效应差异的潜在机制:金纳米棒依赖 Bach-1 诱导 HO-1 表达的实例。

Deciphering an underlying mechanism of differential cellular effects of nanoparticles: an example of Bach-1 dependent induction of HO-1 expression by gold nanorod.

机构信息

College of Pharmaceutical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.

出版信息

Biointerphases. 2012 Dec;7(1-4):10. doi: 10.1007/s13758-011-0010-x. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles are extensively investigated for their potential biomedical applications. Therefore, it is pertinent to thoroughly evaluate their biological effects at different levels and their underlying molecular mechanism. Frequently, there are discrepancies about the biological effects of various gold nanoparticles among the reports dealing with different models. Most of the studies focused on the different biological effects of various nano-properties of the nanomaterials. We hypothesize that the biological models with different metabolic processes would be taken into account to explain the observed discrepancies of biological effects of nanomaterials. Herein, by using mouse embryo fibroblast cell line (MEF-1) and human embryonal lung fibroblast cell line (MRC-5) as in vitro models, we studied the cellular effects of gold nanorods (AuNRs) coated with poly (diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDDAC), polyethylene glycol and polystyrene sulfonae (PSS). We found that all three AuNRs had no effects on cellular viability at the concentration of 1 nM; however, AuNRs that coated with PDDAC and PSS induced significant up-regulation of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) which was believed to be involved in cellular defense activities in MEF-1 but not in MRC-5 cells. Further study showed that the low fundamental expression of transcription factor Bach-1, the major regulator of HO-1 expression, in MEF-1 was responsible for the up-regulation of HO-1 induced by the AuNRs. Our results indicate that although AuNRs we used are non-cytotoxic, they cell-specifically induce change of gene expression, such as HO-1. Our current study provides a good example to explain the molecular mechanisms of differential biological effects of nanomaterials in different cellular models. This finding raises a concern on evaluation of cellular effects of nanoparticles where the cell models should be critically considered.

摘要

金纳米颗粒因其在生物医学中的潜在应用而受到广泛研究。因此,彻底评估其在不同水平上的生物学效应及其潜在的分子机制是很有必要的。经常有报道称,不同模型处理的各种金纳米颗粒的生物学效应存在差异。大多数研究集中在纳米材料的不同纳米特性的不同生物学效应上。我们假设,考虑到具有不同代谢过程的生物模型,将有助于解释纳米材料生物学效应的观察差异。在这里,我们使用小鼠胚胎成纤维细胞系(MEF-1)和人胚肺成纤维细胞系(MRC-5)作为体外模型,研究了涂有聚二烯丙基二甲基氯化铵(PDDAC)、聚乙二醇和聚苯乙烯磺酸钠(PSS)的金纳米棒(AuNRs)的细胞效应。我们发现,所有三种 AuNRs 在 1 nM 的浓度下对细胞活力均没有影响;然而,涂有 PDDAC 和 PSS 的 AuNRs 诱导血红素加氧酶-1(HO-1)的显著上调,这被认为参与了 MEF-1 中的细胞防御活动,但在 MRC-5 细胞中没有。进一步的研究表明,转录因子 Bach-1 的基本表达较低,Bach-1 是 HO-1 表达的主要调节因子,这导致了 MEF-1 中由 AuNRs 诱导的 HO-1 上调。我们的结果表明,尽管我们使用的 AuNRs 没有细胞毒性,但它们会特异性地诱导基因表达的变化,如 HO-1。我们的研究为解释不同细胞模型中纳米材料生物学效应的差异提供了一个很好的例子。这一发现引起了人们对纳米颗粒细胞效应评估的关注,在评估中应严格考虑细胞模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验