Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Clin Lung Cancer. 2013 Jan;14(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 May 15.
Enrollment of patients with lung cancer into clinical trials is required to accelerate the pace of new therapy development and contribute to a better understanding of the biological characteristics of cancer.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients seen by the thoracic medical oncology team at the Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (VICC) from November 2005 to November 2008 to determine the barriers associated with patient enrollment in to clinical trials.
One thousand forty-three patient charts were audited: 32% of patients were eligible for enrollment, and 14% enrolled in a study. There were no significant differences in protocol availability or eligibility by sex, smoking status, or age. Patients living further from the cancer center were significantly less likely to have a study protocol available (P = .009), but if a protocol was available they were more likely to be eligible for enrollment (P < .001). Significantly more protocols were available for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with those who had small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (63% vs. 48%; P < .001). Patients with advanced disease were more likely to have a protocol available (P < .001) and enter a study (P = .031). The most common reasons for patients not being eligible for enrollment were poor performance status (32%) and presence of comorbid disease (27%). The most common reasons for potentially eligible patients not enrolling in a study included preference for treatment closer to home (49%) and patient refusal (43%).
Additional strategies are required to increase accrual of patients into lung cancer trials, including development of protocols for early-stage disease and modifying eligibility and performance status criteria for this unique patient population.
为了加速新疗法的开发,并更好地了解癌症的生物学特征,需要将肺癌患者纳入临床试验。
我们对 2005 年 11 月至 2008 年 11 月期间在范德比尔特英格拉姆癌症中心(VICC)胸科肿瘤学团队就诊的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查,以确定与患者入组临床试验相关的障碍。
共审查了 1043 份患者病历:32%的患者符合入组条件,14%的患者入组了研究。性别、吸烟状况或年龄与方案的可及性或合格性无显著差异。距离癌症中心较远的患者获得研究方案的可能性显著降低(P =.009),但如果有方案可用,他们更有可能符合入组条件(P <.001)。与小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者相比,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的方案可用性显著更高(63%比 48%;P <.001)。晚期疾病患者更有可能获得方案(P <.001)并入组研究(P =.031)。患者不符合入组条件的最常见原因是一般状态较差(32%)和合并疾病(27%)。有资格但未入组研究的患者最常见的原因包括更倾向于接受离家较近的治疗(49%)和患者拒绝(43%)。
需要采取额外的策略来增加肺癌患者参与临床试验的数量,包括制定早期疾病的方案,并修改适合这一独特患者群体的入组标准和一般状态标准。