Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037766. Epub 2012 May 18.
We compared the patterns of medically attended injuries between children with and without disabilities and explored the residential environment risks in five counties of Hubei Province in the People's Republic of China by a 1:1 matched case-control study based on the biopsychosocial model of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health--ICF.
1201 children aged 1-14 with disabilities and 1201 their healthy counterparts matched as having the same gender, same age, and lived in the same neighborhood were recruited in our study. Characteristics of injuries in the past 12 months were compared between children with and without disabilities. The associations among disability status, home environment factors and injuries were examined in logistic regression analysis taking into account sociodemographic factors.
Children with disabilities had a significantly higher prevalence of injury than children without disabilities (10.2% vs. 4.4%; P<.001). The two groups differed significantly in terms of number of injury episodes, injury place and activity at time of injury. Falls were the leading mechanism of injury regardless of disability status. Most of the injury events happened inside the home and leisure activities were the most reported activity when injured for both groups. The univariate OR for injury was 4.46 (2.57-7.74) for the disabled children compared with the non-disabled children. Disabled children whose family raised cat/dog(s) were 76% more likely to be injured during the last 12 months (OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.02, 3.02), comparing with those whose family did not have any cat/dog. And for children without disabilities, those whose family had cat/dog(s) were over 3 times more likely to having injuries comparing with those whose family did not have any cat/dog.
Children with disabilities had a significantly increased risk for injury. Interventions to prevent residential injury are an important public health priority in children with disabilities.
本研究通过基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的生物-心理-社会模式的 1:1 病例对照研究,比较了中国湖北省五个县有残疾和无残疾儿童的医疗就诊伤害模式,并探讨了居住环境风险。
本研究共纳入了 1201 名 1-14 岁有残疾儿童和 1201 名与其性别、年龄和居住在同一社区的健康对照儿童。比较了过去 12 个月有残疾和无残疾儿童的伤害特征。在考虑社会人口学因素的情况下,使用逻辑回归分析检验残疾状况、家庭环境因素与伤害之间的关系。
有残疾儿童的伤害发生率显著高于无残疾儿童(10.2% vs. 4.4%;P<.001)。两组在伤害发作次数、伤害地点和受伤时的活动方面存在显著差异。无论残疾状况如何,跌倒都是主要的伤害机制。大多数伤害事件发生在家庭内部,两组受伤时最常报告的活动是休闲活动。与无残疾儿童相比,残疾儿童的受伤风险比为 4.46(2.57-7.74)。与无宠物家庭相比,家中养猫/狗的残疾儿童在过去 12 个月内受伤的可能性增加 76%(OR=1.76;95% CI=1.02,3.02)。对于无残疾儿童,家中养猫/狗的儿童受伤的可能性是无宠物家庭的 3 倍以上。
有残疾儿童的伤害风险显著增加。预防居住伤害的干预措施是残疾儿童公共卫生的一个重要优先事项。